Advertisement

REG RRF

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

2 posts Page 1 of 1
hi,
iam doing validation for a API, in which Diastereomeric impurity is showing RRF 2.1 with respect to API. My doubt is whether is it acceptable. Because isomer can't be more response.

Thanks in advance.

First of all, did you determine the responses using a pure standard of the impurity (I assume you do have a pure standard of the API)?

Second, what, exactly do you mean by "diastereomeric impurity"? Does your API have multiple chiral centers?

Third, what is your chromophore (I'm assuming UV detection), and where is it on the molecule relative to your chiral centers?

Fourth (again, assuming UV detection) is your wavelength set at an absorbance maximum or is it on slope?

[added as edit 1/5/09]. Fifth, how well separated are the two peaks, and are there any baseline or resolution issues that could result in different integration?
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
2 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 538 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 538 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 538 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry