Advertisement

Void/Dead time in LC/MS

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

5 posts Page 1 of 1
What is an appropriate compound for void time determination for LC/MS for
1. reverse phase
2. HILIC

Are there standard compounds that are always used for these determinations ? Note that the detector is MS, not UV.

Thanks,

Bill

The only requirements are that the "probe" be unretained and detectable. I'm no mass spectrometrist, but I would assume that the standard probes used with UV (e.g., uracil for reversed-phase) would also be detectable with MS.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374

Yes, I agree with the criteria that you described. The question is what compounds meet those criteria. It is essential that the compounds are not retained at all. Many compounds, although not well retained, are actually slightly retained.
The problem with a compound such as uracil is that it will be retained in some conditions in reverse phase.

If you go back and search the current Forum and the archives, you'll find a number of threads on dead time determination. The problem is that there are varying degrees of "unretained", with either charge- or size-exclusion a possibility.

The "best" suggestions for reversed phase (in principle, anyway) were tritium oxide (from Hans Mueller, if memory serves) or deuterium oxide (from Ben Buglio, again, if memory serves). These are small enough to get into all the stationary phase pores, hence no size exclusion, and non-ionic, hence no charge exclusion. I have no idea about MS detectability.

In the case of HILIC, even these choices are problematic because of the water bound to the stationary phase (which means that water is, to a certain extent, "retained").

Of course, a slight degree of retention may not matter unless you are doing detailed calculations of things like distribution coefficients. For tracking a separation, I would think that consistency is more important.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374

Yes, tritiated water is quite good in RP, but is retained in HILIC (extend depending on amt. of organic). I thought that 22-Na+ at a low pH and high ionic strenth mobile phase was quite good but am not sure anymore (possible that there is some exclusion). 36-Cl- at such conditions might be on the "dot". (Note that if you are too basic 22-Na+ will be extremely retained and 36-Cl- will be excluded).
For those who have no access to radioisotpes some have suggested toluene (which I yet want to compare to the radioisotpes).
5 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 204 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 203 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 10230 on Thu Dec 04, 2025 5:56 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 203 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry