by
plusik » Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:18 am
We actually find the source of your problem after a first look on your chromatographic conditions.
You are using ZIC-pHILIC separation column coupled with a ZIC-HILIC guard column. Since ZIC-HILIC is a silica based zwitterionic stationary phase, its useful pH range is 2-8 as SeQuant recommends. In your case, ZIC-HILIC material was slowly dissolved in eluent at pH 9 and resulted MS background. Those pollutants from guard column will finally distort your ZIC-pHILIC column.
Despite that, SeQuant decided to exchange your ZIC-pHILIC column and replace ZIC-HILIC guard column by ZIC-pHILIC guard. We will have further contact with you through
support@sequant.com.
Thank you very much for the support. We had asked our dealer to provide a suitable guard column for ZIC-pHILIC and he sent us the ZIC-HILIC guard. Therefore I didn't expect any problems here.
I will contact you further by e-mail..
If the measured pH of the aqueous buffer is around 9, the effective pH is closer to 10 in the mobile phase. The pKa of carbonate (and other anions) shifts toward the basic end for organic/water mixtures.
Our buffer is 10mM ammonium carbonate + 0.2% NH4OH.
pH is 9.3. When I mix it with ACN 50:50, the pH actually drops to 9.1
plusik, there seems to be nothing mentioned about the matrix of your nucleotides. I am not familiar with the pHILIC column, but have been using ZIC HILIC and Atlantis HILIC. From those I know that they are extremely sensitive toward polar/ionic "dirt" in the sample matrix. Something to whatch.
We were using same sample during 1 week and the conditions were still changing. The sample is dissolved in ACN/MeOH.
Some time ago I did a cursory check on ammonium carbonate, this carbamate equilibrium completely disqualifies this material for use in HPLC in my view.
We were getting pretty nice results with carbonate, until the column condition got worse. Do you recommend to switch to ammonium bicarbonate, while we're still at the method development stage?