change in response
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:56 am
dear friend,
we have validated ms method for isradipine for be studies. my response for LLOQ during validation 45000 but when i performed subject sample anaysis the response drops down to almost half. still my ccs and qcs do not have any problem. all my seniors said that auditors will rise question about it and we have to justify it. we then investigate the problem and it turns out due to the methanol grade. during validation we use brand X and during subject anaysis we use brand Y. now we do not have brand X in stock. can i proceed my analysis provided the justification is due to variation of the brand? did anyone face problem like this? as for me i feel there is nothing wrong but as we are going to face the auditors from outside i just want to know the sugestions from you all.
with regard
pliva
we have validated ms method for isradipine for be studies. my response for LLOQ during validation 45000 but when i performed subject sample anaysis the response drops down to almost half. still my ccs and qcs do not have any problem. all my seniors said that auditors will rise question about it and we have to justify it. we then investigate the problem and it turns out due to the methanol grade. during validation we use brand X and during subject anaysis we use brand Y. now we do not have brand X in stock. can i proceed my analysis provided the justification is due to variation of the brand? did anyone face problem like this? as for me i feel there is nothing wrong but as we are going to face the auditors from outside i just want to know the sugestions from you all.
with regard
pliva