Advertisement

FID response between 5890 and 6890

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
Does exist a reported equivalence between 5890 FID counts and 6890 FID pA?
If you have both instruments, i would advise that you make standards and see if you can come up with your own empirical relationship. I am unaware of a published relationship. The best practice is to calibrate your new instrument independently - not relative to the old.
Thanks!
The question comes from a friend who do service of GCs but I don't know why he asks for that.
If anyone knows it will be Agilent - get your friend to ask them.

Peter
Peter Apps
Your signal-to-noise should be similar, that's what's important.
Signal counts at baseline will be different depending on gas flows, column bleed, and many other variables.

Also sensitivity will be different with the same variables taken into account.

As for whether the readout on the 5890 was in pAmps, not sure on that one. I don't know if it was a direct current read or if it was converted to different units.
The past is there to guide us into the future, not to dwell in.
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 17 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 17 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry