-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:39 pm
Advertisement
Oligonucleotide Separation
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
10 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am currently in the process of developing a reverse phase separation for a synthetic oligonucleotide. I have tried several different columns and procedures supplied by the column manufacturer but in all cases do not obtain a separation just a broad ill-defined peak. Any suggestions?
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Hard to say without more detail, but one thought is that if your "oligo" is reasonably big and not very pure, you may be seeing the "envelope" of a large number of slightly separated peaks.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:50 pm
Andy,
RPLC separations of oligonucleotides often have problems when the oligos have secondary structures. Elevated temperatures may help, but anion-exchange columns like the DNAPac PA100/200 [Dionex] series offer more versatility for breaking the hydrogen bonds that cause the poor chromatography. They also offer better resolution. If your application requires high purity oligo, I would recommend the DNAPac columns.
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
RPLC separations of oligonucleotides often have problems when the oligos have secondary structures. Elevated temperatures may help, but anion-exchange columns like the DNAPac PA100/200 [Dionex] series offer more versatility for breaking the hydrogen bonds that cause the poor chromatography. They also offer better resolution. If your application requires high purity oligo, I would recommend the DNAPac columns.
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
-
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:19 pm
If Tom is right, a further flattening of the gradient will help, and you will get multiple peaks.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:39 pm
We currenly have an anion exchange procedure which offers minimal resoultion between the main components and the impurities. In addition, I have reduced the slope to as low as 0.1% Acetonitrile/minute and have not achieved any resolution between the main peak and the impurities.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:50 pm
Andy,
In your last post you refer to an Anion-Exchange separation, then mention using a slope of 0.1% MeCN/minute gradient. Do these refer to the same method?
For the AEC method, if you are obtaining "minimal resolution between the main component and the impurities", then you may need to adjust the pH. As the eluent pH increases above pH 9, the tautomeric oxygens on each T (or U) and G will begin to ionize, thus increasing the net charge on the oligo in a base-composition dependent manner. At pH ~12, the tautomeric oxygens on both bases will be fully ionized. This often helps resolve difficult to separate components.
In some cases, modification of the oligo (e.g, phosphorothioates) the subtitutions can impede the separations. In such cases altogether different methods may be needed. Are your oligos derivatized?
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
In your last post you refer to an Anion-Exchange separation, then mention using a slope of 0.1% MeCN/minute gradient. Do these refer to the same method?
For the AEC method, if you are obtaining "minimal resolution between the main component and the impurities", then you may need to adjust the pH. As the eluent pH increases above pH 9, the tautomeric oxygens on each T (or U) and G will begin to ionize, thus increasing the net charge on the oligo in a base-composition dependent manner. At pH ~12, the tautomeric oxygens on both bases will be fully ionized. This often helps resolve difficult to separate components.
In some cases, modification of the oligo (e.g, phosphorothioates) the subtitutions can impede the separations. In such cases altogether different methods may be needed. Are your oligos derivatized?
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:35 pm
Andy,
Oligonucleotides with secondary structures (does your oligo have secondary structures?) can give poor chromatography at ambient temperatures. When you run at higher temperatures (60 to 80ºC) you should easily get better resolution. I am going to dig up some literature that show the effect of temperature on separation performance of "difficult" oligos in RP mode (on polymeric RP columns).
Best regards,
Robert Haefele
Hamilton Company
rhaefele_at_hamiltoncompany.com
Oligonucleotides with secondary structures (does your oligo have secondary structures?) can give poor chromatography at ambient temperatures. When you run at higher temperatures (60 to 80ºC) you should easily get better resolution. I am going to dig up some literature that show the effect of temperature on separation performance of "difficult" oligos in RP mode (on polymeric RP columns).
Best regards,
Robert Haefele
Hamilton Company
rhaefele_at_hamiltoncompany.com
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:39 pm
They were separate methods. The anion exchange method uses Tris buffer at pH 8.0 with 1 M LiCl as the eluent. The acetonitrile gradient referred to the reverse phase method which we a trying o develop. Both methods are run at elevated temperature (80 C for anion exchange and 60 C for reverse phase).
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:50 pm
Dear Andy,
Assuming that you are using a non-porous anion exchanger like the DNAPac columns, you may drop the temperature to 25-27°C, and replace the tris buffer with 25 mM NaOH (resulting pH will be 12.4 where Watson-Crick H-bonds are fully disrupted). Do NOT employ both high temperature and high pH with these columns as that combination is known to degrade methacrylate-based phases.
Use of these conditions should dramatically improve your separation, unless you are using either a weak anion exchanger (no capacity at high pH) or a porous strong anion exchanger (with these columns, a much lower flow rate will be needed to recover resolution lost by the poorer mass transfer properties of porous ion-exchange phases).
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
Assuming that you are using a non-porous anion exchanger like the DNAPac columns, you may drop the temperature to 25-27°C, and replace the tris buffer with 25 mM NaOH (resulting pH will be 12.4 where Watson-Crick H-bonds are fully disrupted). Do NOT employ both high temperature and high pH with these columns as that combination is known to degrade methacrylate-based phases.
Use of these conditions should dramatically improve your separation, unless you are using either a weak anion exchanger (no capacity at high pH) or a porous strong anion exchanger (with these columns, a much lower flow rate will be needed to recover resolution lost by the poorer mass transfer properties of porous ion-exchange phases).
Cheers,
Jim Thayer
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:39 pm
Just to update everyone. The magic ingredient to obtain the separation was hexafluoro-2-propanol. The papers that I had read said that this improved the ionization in LCMS but nothing about improving the separation.
10 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 15 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 15 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
