Advertisement

specificity should be first priority

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

7 posts Page 1 of 1
hi everybody,
normally for validation of a formulation, specificity is done during validation only not during development. i feel it should be check during development .if the specificity fails then it comes back to the development team . if it is done before validation during the development it will save time , money and man power. i am new to this feild , is my argument worth.
regard
zydus

Trial lawyers in the US are taught a simple rule: "never ask a question to which you do not already know the answer.". That same rule applies to validation. All of the aspects of validation should have been checked *before* the formal validation process begins.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374

That is what we call method development and evaluation. I will briefly evaluate the method before the formal method validation protocol be signed off.

Zydus

I would disagree with that argument. What you're suggesting is that the analytical development team might say to the formulators, "don't use that ingredient, because it makes things difficult for us development and QC people". But I don't think most pharma companies would agree with that logic. Their thinking will be to develop whatever formulation makes the most sense (in terms of efficacy, safety, stability, etc), and then the analytical people will simply have to figure out how to deal with it.

Adam
hi everybody,
normally for validation of a formulation, specificity is done during validation only not during development. i feel it should be check during development .if the specificity fails then it comes back to the development team . if it is done before validation during the development it will save time , money and man power. i am new to this feild , is my argument worth.
regard
zydus
dear frens,
i dont mean that the formulation should be according to analyst convinient. we always try to minimise the risks of failing a method.if the placebo interferes with analyte then its the duty of development team to develop again a new methods. as far as specificity is concern we take longer time to develop unlike other parameter. so i just feel to evaluate it before transfering to the validation team so that there will be less chances of failure.
lastly thanx everybody for sugestion :roll:

Analytical method development and Drug Product development is a parallel process. But once drug product is finalized, the analytical method should be checked for all the parameters including specificity, precision and recovery before carrying out the validation work as per protocol.

I support!
Excel
7 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 19 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 16 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 16 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry