-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:26 am
Advertisement
Peaks in solvent blank
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am trying to devlope amethod for quinlones and sulfonamides in our xevo TQD LCMSMS.I am facing some problem in flumequin.In blank also there is a peak of flumequine coming.When iam injecting air blank also there is peak of flumequin comes under the same RT.It is probably from mobile phase.But when iam scan with mobile phase with the same combination of mobile phase with same ms condition there is no flumequine is there.I dont no from where this peak of flumequine comes in Blank
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:04 am
There are many possibilities. And one is that it may not even be flumequine.
What we don't know is the history of the instrument and column, the handling of materials in the lab. Nor dow we have any idea of what conditions you are using to elute or detect the flumequine.
On looking at a full scan as opposed to a single MS/MS transistion, the dewell time at any particular mass in full scan will be much less than in MS/MS - and spectral signals for weak peaks disappear into the background.
Possible source for the peak:
- poor needle wash, giving carryover,
- poor seal in the valves in the sampler resulting in carryover.
- accidental contamination of a solvent
- Junk in the solvents with a similar mass and fragmentation pathway to the target
- something coming off an old colulmn - or a column that needs to be more strongly rinsed at the end of a run.
- You could be runnign too close to the void volume with your peak
The list of guesses could go on for pages - more information is needed. And for figuring this out, unfortunately, this sounds like an exercise in patience and checking everything that goes into the instrument and changing conditions to see if this is a coeluting compund that can be resolved with a different column or gradient.
What we don't know is the history of the instrument and column, the handling of materials in the lab. Nor dow we have any idea of what conditions you are using to elute or detect the flumequine.
On looking at a full scan as opposed to a single MS/MS transistion, the dewell time at any particular mass in full scan will be much less than in MS/MS - and spectral signals for weak peaks disappear into the background.
Possible source for the peak:
- poor needle wash, giving carryover,
- poor seal in the valves in the sampler resulting in carryover.
- accidental contamination of a solvent
- Junk in the solvents with a similar mass and fragmentation pathway to the target
- something coming off an old colulmn - or a column that needs to be more strongly rinsed at the end of a run.
- You could be runnign too close to the void volume with your peak
The list of guesses could go on for pages - more information is needed. And for figuring this out, unfortunately, this sounds like an exercise in patience and checking everything that goes into the instrument and changing conditions to see if this is a coeluting compund that can be resolved with a different column or gradient.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:58 pm
I am trying to devlope amethod for quinlones and sulfonamides in our xevo TQD LCMSMS.I am facing some problem in flumequin.In blank also there is a peak of flumequine coming.When iam injecting air blank also there is peak of flumequin comes under the same RT.It is probably from mobile phase.But when iam scan with mobile phase with the same combination of mobile phase with same ms condition there is no flumequine is there.I dont no from where this peak of flumequine comes in Blank
david
I agreed with Hilton
Probability of contamination is in your HPLC part specifically needle, column, valves. As per your detail air blank also give pick and scan you are not gating flumequine pick. Its mean’s it is problem of carryover not solvent contamination because in case of solvent contamination you are gating pick in scane mode in mobile phase. You need to wash needle, column, and valves rigorously. And avoided higher con. injection.
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 67 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 66 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 66 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 66 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
