Advertisement

use different injection volume for standards curve

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
Can I inject different volumes for standard curve construction?
You can, but if this is correct is another question.
For our PQ of our instruments, we test the injection accuracy by injecting different volumes.

The problem by this approach is that your injection volume is almost certain not correct, so your calibration curve is not as accurate as it could be. (eg 21µl instead of 20, 11µl instead of 10µl, ....)

If this is a problem or not depends on your application.

HTH

Ace
In my experience it doesn't work well. If you have your standards made in the exact solution as your beginning mobile phase it will work somewhat, but if your injection solvent is not the same as your mobile phase( standard is in Methanol, mobile phase is 80%H20/20%MeOH) then the increasing amounts of pure Methanol injected will effect the overall response and retention times of your peaks.

If you are using EPA methods it is not allowed as you are required to hold all variables such as injection volume, injection solvent, gradient conditions, temperatures, ect the same for all injections including standards and samples.
The past is there to guide us into the future, not to dwell in.
Can I inject different volumes for standard curve construction?

You could. But if you want to be correct or accurate or following regulations, keep the injection volume constant and vary your standards concentration.
I'll play "devil's advocate" for a moment (because I generally prefer to keep injection volume constant, for all of the reasons cited above).

First of all, in a validated / regulatory method, you have to follow it as written, so you really don't have a choice.

If you are developing / validating a new method you could, in principle, do it either way. Aside from diluent and matrix effects as mentioned above, the major question is "can my autosampler inject with better linearity than I (or my technician) can prepare solutions?". If my standard prep technique is poor, then changing volume is better -- of course, in that case, I have to worry about the prep of the initial standard and the samples!
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
We are applying "calibration from a single standard solution" quite frequently.
This actually applys for partial loop injections as well as for preconcentration techniques. This is possible a we are using the 800 Dosino (a dosing device which initially was developed for titration).

Application Note C-117 shows this for partial loop injection.

In partial loop injection a concentration range of 1 : 100 may be covered. In preconcentration we may go up to 1 : 1000.
Dr. Markus Laeubli
Manager Marketing Support IC
(retired)
Metrohm AG
9101 Herisau
Switzerland
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 27 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 26 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry