Advertisement

choosing wavelength

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

4 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi

Why people tempt to avoid low wavelength(190-210nm) for detection?
Hi

Why people tempt to avoid low wavelength(190-210nm) for detection?
Low wavelength UV responds to lots of different types of materials, so there can be less specificity at the low wavelengths. But if your matrix is clean around your retention time, feel free.

We inherited an assay from a company which used 210nm for a trace level component assay, as the gross absorbance was higher at 210nm. We changed it to 280nm because the matrix then did not interfere, so even though the gross absorbance at the higher wavelength was less, there was a net improvement in selectivity/specificity, and the assay was improved.
Thank you so much!
Most solvents , even water, have high absorbance values below 205 nm ( UV cut-off) , so dynamic range of the UV detectors decrease , and also the noise increase.
4 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 17 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 15 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: satya14, Semrush [Bot] and 15 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry