Page 1 of 1
Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:17 pm
by mmanders
I am using an Agilent 1200 Fraction collector, and it consistently skips the second fraction after a run is started. It doesn't matter where in the plate the run is started, the second fraction is skipped. I have looked all through the method (ChemStation), and even started from a default method. There is no setting to skip a fraction anywhere I can find. Any suggestions?
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:42 pm
by mmanders
Anyone have any ideas?
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:17 pm
by mmanders
Has anyone ever seen this?
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:05 pm
by RBlom
Hi mmanders,
I have just looked into this and found a service note that might cause your problem. It is related to the G1315C/D or G1365C/D firmware causing incorrect fraction trigger under certain circumstances.
Newer FW versions should overcome this problem (FW > B06.13)
As a temp solution you could select threshold or slope only as trigger modes, or specify a threshold that is significant above baseline to prevent a trigger.
Cheers, René Blom
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:22 pm
by mmanders
Thanks for your response. Do you know if this FW error would also affect fractions collected by time, not peak detection?
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:26 pm
by RBlom
Hi, the svc note only mentions peak based fractionation, so I expect that if you collect time-based the problem doesn't occur
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:05 pm
by mmanders
It is actually time-based collection that we are doing when we have the problem. Our techs have reinstalled and updated to the latest firmware without any luck.
Re: Agilent 1200 Fraction Collector skipping fraction
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:04 am
by 5.56x45mm
still sounds like the firmware/driver is using a different vial position vs. what the software thinks. Does it skip vial 2 then it moves on (1,3,4,5,6,7...), or does it increment every 2 vials ex: 1, 3, 5, 7...
try to find where firmware/driver gets vial position information.