-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:35 pm
Advertisement
Area counts rising for subsequent injections
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
For the sake of simplicity, let's pretend I have a sample with two components: analyte and solvent. What are common causes for the area count of the analyte to increase between runs when injecting from the same sample vial?
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:46 am
Analyte carry over somewhere in the chromatographic system.
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:28 pm
For the sake of simplicityFor the sake of simplicity, let's pretend I have a sample with two components: analyte and solvent. What are common causes for the area count of the analyte to increase between runs when injecting from the same sample vial?
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
Actives sites in the sample flow path which become blocked with the analyte after continued injections.
These active sites could also be sites of catalytic decomposition of the analyes as well. So if they become 'consumed' then more of the analyte peak will elute to the injector.
Of course, all this assumes that your detector is not changing, becoming more sensitive due to some cause.
Murphy is alive and well and has been known to play all sorts of tricks on the unwary.
So be wary.
best wishes,
Rod
These active sites could also be sites of catalytic decomposition of the analyes as well. So if they become 'consumed' then more of the analyte peak will elute to the injector.
Of course, all this assumes that your detector is not changing, becoming more sensitive due to some cause.
Murphy is alive and well and has been known to play all sorts of tricks on the unwary.
So be wary.
best wishes,
Rod
-
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:29 pm
If the most simple possible scenario: If you have two runs there is an exactly 50% chance that the peak area for the second run will be bigger than the peak area for the first, and there is absolutley nothing that you can do about it.
Peter
Peter
Peter Apps
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
Peter's reply is accurate to within one part per infinity, which is pretty close as far as accuracy goes.
It is possible that the two would exactly match.
But that likelihood is like having two posters exactly agree on an answer, which is also one part per infinity, give or take a part.
best wishes,
Rod
It is possible that the two would exactly match.
But that likelihood is like having two posters exactly agree on an answer, which is also one part per infinity, give or take a part.
best wishes,
Rod
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:14 pm
What's the detector?
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 28 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 28 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
