Advertisement

HELP: Loss of phenols, erratic behavior

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

2 posts Page 1 of 1
My lab is suddenly struggling with a few of our mass specs. The issue is the loss of pentachlorophenol in the tune standard and all phenols/aniline compounds in the calibration standard (we are running method 8270). The issue is new, we've been running this method for years on multiple instruments with little trouble. At first signs of loss we would do routine maintenance, clip column, change liner, etc. I just did maintenance on one instrument yesterday and today pcp in the tune standard is almost non-existent. So my biggest question is where do I focus my attention? The inlet? The column?

Oh and one of our analysts mentioned that he would struggle with a new column for weeks then all of a sudden the response for these compounds was good, and calibration would hold well for a couple weeks, then all of a sudden it would fall out. He even ran back to back injections of a tune standard, pcp response was good in first and poor in second injection. Instrument conditions will follow shortly.....

We are running a couple different setups, one pulsed splitless, for trace analysis of water samples, and the other is split injection (10:1). We are having fewer issues with the instrument running pulsed splitless.

Column: Rtx-5 Sil MS w/10m integra guard. flow:1.4mL/min

EDIT: Update: I just ran tune standard by pulsed splitless and response of pcp relative to dftpp was MUCH better than with a split.
If only I could come up with a reliable split injection technique that wouldn't result in loss of these compounds. We're going to be running dirty (not trace) samples and high MW compound contamination may be a great concern in the near future. As for now the pulsed splitless is the only thing working. Calibration curve running now....
Regards,

Christian
So I am going through the curve right now and there's still an issue with the difficult compounds. 2,4-dinitrophenol response factors for 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50 ppm DOUBLE each level so calibration is impossible. There's definitely still something wrong with the system, and I hesitate to use this splitless method for ugly soil sample extracts, it may ruin the column quickly.
Regards,

Christian
2 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 176 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 176 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry