Advertisement

ELSD sensitivity

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

5 posts Page 1 of 1
Hello,

I am trying to solve a problem. I am analysing for glyphosine by ELSD. At higher concentrations the analysis works perfectly. However, I now need to go to lower cocentrations, e.g. down to 0.1 % and I find that signal to noise is very bad. I use Alltech 3300 instrument. The mobile phase is 100 % aqueous with 0.2 % TFA. The ELSD method wizard suggests drift tube temp. of 40 deg. C and nitrogen flow of 1.5 L/ min, however I find that too noisy and use 85 deg. C and 2.0 L/min. Manufacturer's settings never worked for me. How can I increase the sensitivity and S/N in this situation?

Thanks a lot

Bangkok34
Hi, Bangkok 34

I have the same instrument as you have. If you look in the manual, the procudure to fine tune the operating conditions are described there.
First, you need a high enough temperature in the drift tube to evaporate the eluent. I think that you can go to a high temperature, since your analyte is not very volatile.
Second, the gas flow is of importance, and my understanding is to have a as low gasflow as possible. A lower gasflow created larger particles and thus increases the sensitivity.
Check the manual for more details and the procedure.
Regards,
Gilbert Staepels

Ideas mentioned in this note represent my own and not necesseraly those of the company I work for.
Hi, Bangkok 34

I have the same instrument as you have. If you look in the manual, the procudure to fine tune the operating conditions are described there.
First, you need a high enough temperature in the drift tube to evaporate the eluent. I think that you can go to a high temperature, since your analyte is not very volatile.
Second, the gas flow is of importance, and my understanding is to have a as low gasflow as possible. A lower gasflow created larger particles and thus increases the sensitivity.
Check the manual for more details and the procedure.
I appreciate your help on this. Thanks a lot! I will give it a go.
B
One thing to keep in mind with the ELSD is that the signal is very non-linear. Doubling analyte concentration will far more than double the signal strength. Conversely, halving the analyte concentration will far more than halve the signal strength. This gets to be quite a problem with low sample concentrations. You would do best to reoptimize detector conditions for the low concentrations you now have to deal with.
One thing to keep in mind with the ELSD is that the signal is very non-linear. Doubling analyte concentration will far more than double the signal strength. Conversely, halving the analyte concentration will far more than halve the signal strength. This gets to be quite a problem with low sample concentrations. You would do best to reoptimize detector conditions for the low concentrations you now have to deal with.
Thanks, Yes, it's certainly non-linear. I optimised the conditions for my concentration range. Yet, still a bit unhappy with the amount of noise I am getting, but the method is workable now.

Regards
B
5 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 364 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 363 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 363 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry