-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:27 pm
Advertisement
Montelukast carryover
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am encountering big carry over of Montelukast. No matter what I do the system is showing peak after I run the high concentratred std or sample. Anybody faced this issue before. Please help
umos
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
How much carryover, exactly (what percentage)?
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:27 pm
About 1-2%. No matter how much we clean the system, wash the seals and needle. The peak is still there. Can any body suggest what is the best wash solution we can use to encounter with such kind of APIs
umos
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:09 pm
Usually carryover that high is associated with some kind of volumetric resevoir in the injector.
To confirm this I would do gradient blanks without moving the injector mechanism. If the peaks go away its probably an improperly seated tube in your injector tubing or valve.
What sort of injector are you using?
To confirm this I would do gradient blanks without moving the injector mechanism. If the peaks go away its probably an improperly seated tube in your injector tubing or valve.
What sort of injector are you using?
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Next step is to do a standard followed by two successive blanks and look at the pattern of decrease in the blanks. If it's exponential (e.g., 1%, then 0.01%) then it is likely to be "physical" carryover as suggested by Chromatographer2010. To confirm that, run a standard and blanks of something else (uracil is unretained on most reversed-phase systems and would be a reasonable choice); you should see the same pattern.
If the decrease is more linear (e.g., 1%, then 0.5%), then it is more likely to be "chemical' carryover, involving adsorption somewhere in the system. To confirm, run a different standard; you should see much less carryover.
If it's physical, then washing won't help. The most likely culprit is a poorly assembled fitting somewhere. If it's chemical, then washing may help (what have you tried so far?), but you may have to change the material of the rotor or the loop.
If the decrease is more linear (e.g., 1%, then 0.5%), then it is more likely to be "chemical' carryover, involving adsorption somewhere in the system. To confirm, run a different standard; you should see much less carryover.
If it's physical, then washing won't help. The most likely culprit is a poorly assembled fitting somewhere. If it's chemical, then washing may help (what have you tried so far?), but you may have to change the material of the rotor or the loop.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:27 pm
Thanks for your reply. It is likely to be physical carry over. Initially it seems to be reduced(chemical carry over) after few blank injects it remains constant(physical carry over). I am going try to work on fittings and loops
umos
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Uhhh, we may be talking at cross-purposes. If the amount that comes off in each successive blank remains relatively constant, then it's likely to be a *chemical* problem, with the material gradually being desorbed.
*Physical* carryover cotinues to drop off exponentially (1%, 0.01%, 0.0001% . . . ). By the third or fourth blank injection, it should essentially be all gone.
All that said, it can't hurt to check the plumbing!
*Physical* carryover cotinues to drop off exponentially (1%, 0.01%, 0.0001% . . . ). By the third or fourth blank injection, it should essentially be all gone.
All that said, it can't hurt to check the plumbing!
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 20 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 18 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 18 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 18 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
