-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:35 pm
Advertisement
Ion exchange w/ELSD
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
9 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am currently using a silica based amino column (Imtakt US-amino) to perform an ion exchange separation of a polysulfated disaccahride. Per the method, the standard is prepared in the mobile phase buffer and the sample is prepared in an acid/base solution (because this is the only thing that will solubilize the compound of interest). The pH of the final sample solution is around 3. The mobile phase/diluent pH is 3.5. I am using ELSD detection at 70C. Here is my problem . . . the standard and sample responses (though prepared at the same level) are orders of magnitude different!
Can someone offer an explanation as to the chemistry of what is occuring to cause such an effect and what I might do to remedy the situation? Please advise if more info is needed to assess. Thank you!
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:59 pm
You might be absorbing part of your material on the column. Inject sample without column, measure peak area and compare it with sum of all peaks with the column. You should get a close match.
Also if you start clipping off stationary phase your background will go and your sensitivity will go down.
Also if you start clipping off stationary phase your background will go and your sensitivity will go down.
Vlad Orlovsky
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
-
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:42 pm
Which one is higher, the standard or the sample? And when you say different are you talking about intensities at the same gain level or S/N? If your standard is higher, what happens if you spike your sample with known amount of standard?
-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 3:15 am
Detector response - is this referring to peak height or peak area?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:35 pm
Vlad - I don't understand how I can inject sample without a column and expect to get a peak from which I can measure peak area. No column, no separation, no peak. I believe the stationary phase is quite stable.
Kostas - The standard response is higher both in height and area. All solutions are run under the same detector conditions (i.e. Gain =1)
Bryan - see my response to Kostas.
Thank you all for your input! I really do appreciate your assistance. This project is killing me!
Kostas - The standard response is higher both in height and area. All solutions are run under the same detector conditions (i.e. Gain =1)
Bryan - see my response to Kostas.
Thank you all for your input! I really do appreciate your assistance. This project is killing me!
-
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:42 pm
So what happens if you do standard additions of your standard into your sample?
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
I'm a bit unclear on your original post. I'm assuming that you can prepare a "standard" both ways (i.e., one in mobile phase, and one in your "acid-base solution"), and you get higher response from the one prepped in mobile phase. Is that right?
So, a couple of naive questions:
1. If you can dissolve your compound in mobile phase to create the "standard", why is "the acid-base solution" necessary to solubilize the compound of interest? Or is it a case of unsticking it from the matrix?
2. Have you tried a standard addition run to establish recovery? (spike an couple of your prepped samples with a known volume of your two highest level standards and see if the slope of the resulting 2-point line matches the slope of your calibration line. If it *does*, that suggests that the problem may be incomplete extraction from your matrix. *If it doesn't*, that suggests that there is something about that "acid-base solution" causing your compound to degrade (or associate?).
So, a couple of naive questions:
1. If you can dissolve your compound in mobile phase to create the "standard", why is "the acid-base solution" necessary to solubilize the compound of interest? Or is it a case of unsticking it from the matrix?
2. Have you tried a standard addition run to establish recovery? (spike an couple of your prepped samples with a known volume of your two highest level standards and see if the slope of the resulting 2-point line matches the slope of your calibration line. If it *does*, that suggests that the problem may be incomplete extraction from your matrix. *If it doesn't*, that suggests that there is something about that "acid-base solution" causing your compound to degrade (or associate?).
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 3:15 am
I wonder if you have poor recovery from sample preparation?
Have you tried this type of experiment:
Solution A: perform sample prep procedure on standard solution
Solution B: standard solution
Compare peak area (i.e. % recovery) between the two solutions?
(oops, sorry, Tom's and Kostas's suggestions will be faster to do, and may provide
more information).
Have you tried this type of experiment:
Solution A: perform sample prep procedure on standard solution
Solution B: standard solution
Compare peak area (i.e. % recovery) between the two solutions?
(oops, sorry, Tom's and Kostas's suggestions will be faster to do, and may provide
more information).
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:59 pm
You are not looking at separation without column, but you need to know if everything you inject in the column is eluting from the column. You inject sample without column and you see one peak, which represent everything you have in your sample. You inject your sample with the column, you hopefully separate peaks, you measure each peak area and combine peak areas. Combined peak area should match peak area for one peak without column. Sometimes this is not working if for example you inject sodium chloride into ion-exchange column (mixed-mode, ion-exchange) and use ACN/water/TFA as eluent. Without column you see both sodium and chloride as one peak, but on a column sodium and chloride separate and you don’t see chloride ions, unless you use ammonium formate or amonium acetate (ELSD or Corona).
Vlad Orlovsky
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
9 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 12 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 12 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
