by
Austin » Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:30 am
Thanks for your replying!
The gradient method comprises of two mobile phases:
A:pH3.0 acetate buffer-ACN(70:30), B:pH3.0 acetate buffer-ACN(20:80),
Gradient:10%-20%-100%-100%B(0-15-18-23min)
The chromatographic parameters are kept constant in sequence running(pressure, temperature, flow). For degassing, some batches of mobile phase which weren't be degassed completely had no impact on the baseline drop in previous runs yet, and the equipment can degas automatically, so I think those parameters are not be suspected.
Then I tried the isocratic equilibration of the column(100%B) and the baseline dropped and then uprised:
This time the period became bigger and more regularly(about 30min), and I didn't think the pump malfunction is the source of this problem, so the left suspicious parts are the injection loop and detector, OK, what can I do next step?
BTW, the buffer solution preparation is suitable
(1L of 10mM acetate solution added 8ml TEA and 5ml TFA, then adjust pH3.0 with 20% TFA)?
because the analyte is a polar compound and analyzed with IPC method in USP&EP, for slow column equilibration and expensive IPC reagent, so our lab developed the gradient method, but from now on it seems that this method is not suitable for the compound analysis, it may be optimzed.