-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:55 pm
Advertisement
Mass difference of 22
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
I got a few masses with difference of 22. For the first two, I could assume they are protonated species and sodium addicts. But what about the followings? It can not be 2 Na's since it will be doubly charged. Any comments. Thank you in advance.
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:03 pm
So you are seeing "X", "X+22", "X+44", "X+66", etc?
If that is the case, I don't have an answer for you, but just wanted to clarify.
If that is the case, I don't have an answer for you, but just wanted to clarify.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:55 pm
Actually I only observed X, X+22, X+44. Any explaination? Thanks.
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:03 pm
If the molecule has an acidic group, I suppose it could lose a proton and gain an additional sodium. So the X+44 would be (M+2Na-H)+.
I have seen sodium adduct to dicarboxylic acids in negative mode (minus 2H, plus Na), but I don't recall if I've ever seen the above phenomenon.
Alternately, if you think they could be separate compounds, this paper has an explanation for a mass difference of 22:
Kalgutkar and Nguyen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2004, 32(9), 943-952
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/32/9/943
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/cgi/conten ... t/32/9/943
I have seen sodium adduct to dicarboxylic acids in negative mode (minus 2H, plus Na), but I don't recall if I've ever seen the above phenomenon.
Alternately, if you think they could be separate compounds, this paper has an explanation for a mass difference of 22:
Kalgutkar and Nguyen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2004, 32(9), 943-952
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/32/9/943
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/cgi/conten ... t/32/9/943
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 1:46 pm
First of all we are suposing that you are using an ESI positive mode to ionize the sample, no ?
I agree with MG opinions.
Another way to be sure that is Na+ aducts is to try to find 2X+22 and also 2X+44 then it will confirm the presence of Na+ in a dicarboxylic acid.
It also will be interesting to know if you see anything in negative mode
I agree with MG opinions.
Another way to be sure that is Na+ aducts is to try to find 2X+22 and also 2X+44 then it will confirm the presence of Na+ in a dicarboxylic acid.
It also will be interesting to know if you see anything in negative mode
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:55 pm
Thanks, MG and Basil. Actually I did ESI- scan and found same mass difference. Any comments?
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:03 pm
In negative mode, it depends on how many protons your molecule could reasonably lose. So you could see:
(M-H)- = X
(M-2H+Na)- = X+22
(M-3H+2Na)- = X+44
if it seems reasonable that your molecule could lose three protons based on its chemistry.
(M-H)- = X
(M-2H+Na)- = X+22
(M-3H+2Na)- = X+44
if it seems reasonable that your molecule could lose three protons based on its chemistry.
7 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 35 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 35 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science