-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:58 pm
Advertisement
FID signal lower with Nitrogen vs Helium carrier gas
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Area of peaks in the test mixture of alkanes is about 2.5 times lower when using Nitrogen as a carrier gas vs. Helium. In both cases Nitrogen used as Make-up gas. Linearity and precision checks are passed in both cases. What might be the problem?
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:46 pm
Without pulling out my reference on the difference effect between He & N2 on the FID, there is a tremendous difference with chromatography.
In nearly all applications He will be a superior carrier gas improving overall chromatography, from shorter retention times to better overall resolution. N2 theoretically has a lower HETP, but given we're usually temperature programing, and N2 HETP curve increases fairly rapidly in both directions, it is generally more of a problem than a help. I would suspect for more specific info, you'll need to post more details on the analysis you're performing.
Greg
In nearly all applications He will be a superior carrier gas improving overall chromatography, from shorter retention times to better overall resolution. N2 theoretically has a lower HETP, but given we're usually temperature programing, and N2 HETP curve increases fairly rapidly in both directions, it is generally more of a problem than a help. I would suspect for more specific info, you'll need to post more details on the analysis you're performing.
Greg
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:58 pm
Greg, thanks for your input. I am aware of the differences in van Deemter curves for Nitrogen and Helium. The effect of the make-up gas on the FID signal (higher response with Nitrogen vs Helium make-up) was discussed on this forum earlier as well. Please, correct me if I wrong, but peak area should not change so drastically with the changes in HETP.
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:50 pm
Is this an EPC instrument? Did you change the carrier gas type in the config? Maybe the split is wrong if you didn't change the gas type?
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:46 pm
Here's what may be going on; assuming this is capillary, and also that you're optimizing flow for the two different carrier gases, you're probably 2X the flow into the column between He and N2. If you've maintained the same splitless time due to the increase in flow into the column you're going to be delivering more analyte into the column.
Greg
Greg
-
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:29 pm
larkl and Greg have probably got it - this is an inlet pneumatics rather than a detector problem. Check actual split and septum purge flows with a bubble flow meter, and measure the retention of someting unretained (the gas hold up time), they will tell you if the GC knows which gas it is working with.
Peter
Peter
Peter Apps
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 10 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 9 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 9 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 9 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
