-
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:10 pm
Advertisement
HELP!!! SPME
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
27 posts
Page 2 of 2
The more you dilute the sample, the less you will be able to see acetaldehyde. We use static headspace for AA and DMS in beer. If you want it using SPME you might try the carboxen/pdms (black) fiber. I find it to be a little better for really light materials.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:02 pm
Is it possible to not dilute the beer samples at all? I don't have car/pdms.The more you dilute the sample, the less you will be able to see acetaldehyde. We use static headspace for AA and DMS in beer. If you want it using SPME you might try the carboxen/pdms (black) fiber. I find it to be a little better for really light materials.
-
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:10 pm
I never dilute the beer if it's somewhere close to 5% (v/v) EtOH.
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:17 pm
Keep in mind acetaldehyde is a small 2 carbon molecule. It won't bind to the fiber as tightly as larger compounds and the ethanol is going to crowd out a lot of analytes. Also it's small size gives it a low repsonse to begin with so your LOD is going to be pretty high for acetaldehyde.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:02 pm
Thanks for the post. It's better to adjust the EtOH concentrations in the samples until 5% v/v? I'm afraid that excessive dilution won't allow FID detecting the aroma compounds.I never dilute the beer if it's somewhere close to 5% (v/v) EtOH.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:02 pm
Thank you. What is the approximate LOD for AA using the SPME?Keep in mind acetaldehyde is a small 2 carbon molecule. It won't bind to the fiber as tightly as larger compounds and the ethanol is going to crowd out a lot of analytes. Also it's small size gives it a low repsonse to begin with so your LOD is going to be pretty high for acetaldehyde.
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:17 pm
We still did pretty good though we were a bit overgenerous with the LOQ. Our level 1 was 20 ppb.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:02 pm
You did that with SPME and FID?We still did pretty good though we were a bit overgenerous with the LOQ. Our level 1 was 20 ppb.
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:17 pm
No MSD-scan Though we probably could have done better on some compounds using the SIM/SCAN and using the SIM mode on the more trace compounds.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:02 pm
Could you tell me please how many times i need to dilute the sample consisting 40%v/v EtOH in order to avoid fiber swelling?
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:17 pm
You're going to have to experimentally determine that. run a dilution series until you get the optimal combination of less SPME swelling and detectablilty of your analytes.Could you tell me please how many times i need to dilute the sample consisting 40%v/v EtOH in order to avoid fiber swelling?
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:59 am
Hi Xeim, measuring of low boiling aroma compounds with only FID is a problematic task.
I do this with MSD because into the range of acetaldehyde elution could be present methanol or some light hydrocarbons. First of all you need, as recommended from other colleague, to decrease the inlet diameter to the minimun possible. In my case I using a self made on-column arrangement and inject the fiber directly into 0.53 mm id precolumn. In this way without splitting or cryotrapping it's possible to see also permanent gases such as oxigen, argon or nitrogen. With DB-5ms, 60m, the elution order is permanent gases togheter followed from propane, isobutane, butane, SO2, acetaldehyde, methanol and so on. But without MSD and with optimized injection system you need anyway a very polar and long column to discriminate from non polar compounds very often present on acetaldehyde range and also to increase separation between acetadehyde and methanol.
I hope to be helpful to you.
Robertino
I do this with MSD because into the range of acetaldehyde elution could be present methanol or some light hydrocarbons. First of all you need, as recommended from other colleague, to decrease the inlet diameter to the minimun possible. In my case I using a self made on-column arrangement and inject the fiber directly into 0.53 mm id precolumn. In this way without splitting or cryotrapping it's possible to see also permanent gases such as oxigen, argon or nitrogen. With DB-5ms, 60m, the elution order is permanent gases togheter followed from propane, isobutane, butane, SO2, acetaldehyde, methanol and so on. But without MSD and with optimized injection system you need anyway a very polar and long column to discriminate from non polar compounds very often present on acetaldehyde range and also to increase separation between acetadehyde and methanol.
I hope to be helpful to you.
Robertino
27 posts
Page 2 of 2
Who is online
In total there are 43 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 43 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
