by
XL » Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:43 am
The most important aspect of any separation is selectivity, which is the strength of mixed-mode column. Although at beginning using one of these columns might not be as "straightforward" as using a C18 column, once we grasp the essence of the column chemistry, sometimes if not most times, method development can be much faster and easier.
In my opinoin, two factors hinder the acceptance of mixed-mode technology. First is the success and popular usage reversed-phase columns (e.g.C18) which allows many chromatographers to be able to generate good results while staying in their comforting zones. But people will appreciate it when mixed-mode columns offer solutions to the challenges that can't be addressed by reversed-phase columns. The second issue is the one brought up here - availability from multiple vendors. When I talked to the customers on the same subject, I was asked the same questions. To my knowledge, there are only two companies offering "modernized" mixed-mode HPLC columns - SIELC and Dionex. Here are some information on Dionex Mixed-Mode Columns for your information:
Silica-based mixed-mode columns:
Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 (
http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/488 ... 021407.pdf)
Acclaim Mixed-Mode WCX-1 (
http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/658 ... PN2024.pdf)
Acclaim Mixed-Mode HILIC-1 (
http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/618 ... PN1963.pdf)
Polymer-based mixed-mode columns
OmniPac PAX100
OmniPac PAX500
OmniPac PCX100
OmniPac PCX500
(
http://www.dionex.com/en-us/columns-acc ... 60681.html)
As a start, a user may try general-purpose RP columns first. If all fails, a proper mixed-mode column should be considered and it will most likely solve the problem. Once we have confidence and sufficient familarity of these columns, we can choose a right mixed-mode column right from the beginning. That is why I like to call them "general-purpose specialty" columns.
Thanks for reading and have fun!