Advertisement

Oxygen related peak

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
I am seeing a peak in my chromatogram that I've determined to be caused by an elevated oxygen level in the sample. I am trying to mitigate its impact by altering the amount of dissolved gases in the mobile phase and/or sample. The link suggests that a negative peak can be obtained if the mobile phase contains more dissolved oxygen than the sample. This doesn't make sense since the lack of something does not produce a peak directly. Is it more likely that the peak attributed to oxygen is actually a solvent peak with a higher concentration of dissolved oxygen?
For anyone with experience on this issue:
Is it easy to nullify an interference related to dissolved oxygen by 'balancing' the absorbtion of the sample and mobile phase?

http://www.shimadzu.com/an/hplc/support ... 37lab.html
The link suggests that a negative peak can be obtained if the mobile phase contains more dissolved oxygen than the sample. This doesn't make sense since the lack of something does not produce a peak directly.
Actually, the lack of something *does* show as a negative peak at the same retention time as the presence of that something. The phenomenon is called "vacancy chromatography" and has actually been exploited as an analytical technique.
Is it more likely that the peak attributed to oxygen is actually a solvent peak with a higher concentration of dissolved oxygen?
That is a "distinction without a difference". :wink:
Is it easy to nullify an interference related to dissolved oxygen by 'balancing' the absorbtion of the sample and mobile phase?
"Absorbance matching" *can* be done, but is a PITA to get those small differences to match up, so very few people do it. A better (easier) approach would be to tweak the selectivity so as to move your analyte peaks away from the interference.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
Thanks Tom. I'll go with your suggestion. This situation revealed an unexpected source of interference. I've never seen this before. I'm sure it's been present but it hadn't created a problem.
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 22 users online :: 4 registered, 0 hidden and 18 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 18 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry