Advertisement

Consultants and vendors on the Forum

Off-topic conversations and chit-chat.

5 posts Page 1 of 1

I apologise to the thread author for interjecting without moving the intended topic of discussion along, but I have two questions. They are essentially raised by a non-answer and propagated by concern for the evolution of the forum. This should probably go in 'Around the Water Cooler' but I fear it will be overlooked in the quieter area of the board.

To chromatographer1:
Now that you are a consultant, I am curious to know whether your history of sharing much knowledge and solving or helping to solve myriad of application problems on the chromforum will be or has been ceased in favour of private off-line discussion?

To admin:
Not having noticed any official word on this subject, is it appropriate for me to ask for clarification on the board operator's view on invitations from consultants or industry/manufacturer reps to Joe user to "call or email me at the office"?

In my view this contravenes the fundamental philosophy of a message board; to share knowledge. That is, to discuss the subjects openly such that any member or viewer (present or future) can benefit*. In essence this is a universal precursor to all forum usage; if you haven't got anything useful to add, don't click submit. If you don't want to discuss openly, don't post.

The solicitation of off-line discussion with a consultant would only raise one question with me. How much are they going to charge? Is the board now a place to post your business card? At least the column suppliers are willing to post examples and discuss a bit of theory to stir the enquiring reader's mind.

On a free-to-use board with freely flowing information, the word consultant is actually quite depressing to read.

*If not, we might aswell remove the Search function.

Regarding JA's off-topic remarks, I tend to agree. When instrument manufacturers/resellers crawl out of the woodwork, like in this thread, it really makes my skin crawl. I'd rather they just link to a product brochure and be done with it.

Back on topic:
I have modified and "validated" the updated <467> to encompass the Class 1, 2A and 2B solvents, as well as ~10 other solvents using a GC/MS. This way I get all solvents simultaneously and can confirm identities. What I have run into issue with is the class 3 solvents, of which you have 2 listed. I am collecting the other class 3 members and plan on incorporating them into a separate headspace sample, in case our gravimetric class 3 test fails. We'll see if the acids play nice with the GC in the next few days.

I see your point. This is my last post.

chromatographer1

JA, Schmitty, Rod

Life is not so simple - see you at the water cooler.

Peter
Peter Apps

For the continuation of this thread, see "Consultants on the Forum":
http://www.sepsci.com/chromforum/viewtopic.php?t=9166
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
5 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry