GC response changes for PCB analysis
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:17 pm
Dear Friends,
I hope you can help me with the following situation; After a recent preventive maintenance my GC separations of PCBs (EPA 8082 method) have decreased 10x in response (875mV vs 76.1mV aproximately, measured for the largest peak). The retention has not changed and the makeup gas or detector gases have been kept the same. Column and flowrates are also the same. No leaks have been detected.
My basic question is how can a change in injector insert, resetting of the column connections, and a change of some gas filters, produce such a drop in response?. Are there any parts of the Varian CP 3380 model (injector 1177) so critical that could produce the observed change?
Perhaps you have observed similar problems in other analyses. I would like to hear your suggestions and experiences in dealing with these situations.
Thanks in advance
josebenjamin
I hope you can help me with the following situation; After a recent preventive maintenance my GC separations of PCBs (EPA 8082 method) have decreased 10x in response (875mV vs 76.1mV aproximately, measured for the largest peak). The retention has not changed and the makeup gas or detector gases have been kept the same. Column and flowrates are also the same. No leaks have been detected.
My basic question is how can a change in injector insert, resetting of the column connections, and a change of some gas filters, produce such a drop in response?. Are there any parts of the Varian CP 3380 model (injector 1177) so critical that could produce the observed change?
Perhaps you have observed similar problems in other analyses. I would like to hear your suggestions and experiences in dealing with these situations.
Thanks in advance
josebenjamin