Advertisement

Particle Size Distribution - Misleading information?

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

4 posts Page 1 of 1
I was looking for some information about HPLC columns with sub 2 micron particles, when I came across the following figure on a manufacturer's website (I replaced the column name by a black box):

Image

In the title of the figure is stated: "An exceptionally accurate mean and a tight, symmetrical distribution around 1.9 µm"

Looking at the figure, I indeed see a Gaussian distribution; but having a second look, I noticed that the X-axis is logarithmic !!!!! With a linear scale, the distribution would have a large tale.

Is it normal to display the particle size axis as a logarithmic scale, or is this a piece of very misleading information?

Some newer silica based sub 2 µm particle columns indicate to cause less back pressure. Is this because very small particles are absent? And the presence of (a small quantity of) larger particles has a substantial negative impact on column efficiency?

Logarithmic scales for PSDs are the norm in my experience, but if you note the distribution extends well below 1-um. Presenting results on a volume (rather than number) distribution then claiming no <1 um particles is very misleading. I'm sure a number distribution of particles would show a mean of like 0.7 um (or less).

The standard tools for measuring particle size distribution display the distribution on a logarithmic scale. So there is nothing wrong with that.

That said, this particle size distribution is by no means "tight". It actually is fairly broad, as you have accurately observed. It is way outside the specifications on particle size distribution that I am used to at my company.

I've actually taken apart columns and sized the particles using laser light diffraction backed up with SEM data and found the 'advertising' to be a little misleading.

It's hard to believe that the distribution above has particles down to 0.1um and no further, is this backed up by SEM? You shouldn't always rely on one technique (especially the black box of particle sizing) on characterising particles.
4 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 14 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 12 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], John Guajardo and 12 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry