Organic acids on C18 column
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 7:34 pm
I recently implemented a method transfer for determining residual TFA/Acetate on a C18 column, and it works brilliantly. I'm just kind of curious as to how it works, though. Are TFA/Acetate actually retained by hydrophobic interactions, or is there something else going on?
The conditions are:
0.1M pH ~2 phosphate buffer with 2% MeOH
1.5mL/min flow rate
C18 column, 4.6x250mm, 90-120A pore (haven't tried anything larger, honestly), 5µm packing.
UV Detection at 210nm
k' values for both compounds are less than or equal to 1, but reproducability and linearity is easy to achieve. Resolution is easily better than 2 with a few of the columns I've used, but it seems better on vanilla C18 columns (like a YMC ODS-A) than on, say, an aqueous C18 column (like a Phenomenex Gemini). The TFA peak is pretty asymmetrical, kind of right-triangle looking, but the Acetate peak is perfection on a good column.
I could see the acetic acid being retained by reversed phase mechanisms, but the TFA is both highly fluorous AND deprotonated so it's gotta be pretty polar too. Anyone have any ideas about how the TFA is being retained?
The conditions are:
0.1M pH ~2 phosphate buffer with 2% MeOH
1.5mL/min flow rate
C18 column, 4.6x250mm, 90-120A pore (haven't tried anything larger, honestly), 5µm packing.
UV Detection at 210nm
k' values for both compounds are less than or equal to 1, but reproducability and linearity is easy to achieve. Resolution is easily better than 2 with a few of the columns I've used, but it seems better on vanilla C18 columns (like a YMC ODS-A) than on, say, an aqueous C18 column (like a Phenomenex Gemini). The TFA peak is pretty asymmetrical, kind of right-triangle looking, but the Acetate peak is perfection on a good column.
I could see the acetic acid being retained by reversed phase mechanisms, but the TFA is both highly fluorous AND deprotonated so it's gotta be pretty polar too. Anyone have any ideas about how the TFA is being retained?