Page 1 of 1

VPH calibration failing

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:52 pm
by Gugu
Afternoon to everyone

I have been trying to calibrate a method for analysing Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons using headspace(Single Ion Monitoring) on a Bruker Scion SQ GC-MS, with an Rxi-5Sil MS column. The standard I am using is a Restek one, WA VPH Standard(1 000 ug/mL). The standard has 15 components in it and the problem I am having is that the regression is bad(as each component has its own linear curve), for the BTEX components in the standard the regression is closer to 1 but still off by about 8-20%. Then the rest of the components like the aliphatics have a coefficient of determination that is way below, like 0.079 which then either over-recovers the actual prepared concentration or under-recovers.

Has anyone ever worked with this standard or had a similar problem? How unstable can these standards be?

Kind regards
Gugu

Re: VPH calibration failing

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:10 pm
by Peter Apps
Hi Gugu

Unless you tell us your methods nobody can do anything except guess.

The more you don't tell us, the more we can't help you.

Peter

Re: VPH calibration failing

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 7:24 am
by Gugu
Hi Gugu

Unless you tell us your methods nobody can do anything except guess.

The more you don't tell us, the more we can't help you.

Peter
Hi Peter

I developed a method combining modified(by me) EPA method 8015 for analysing Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and EPA method 5012A for Volatile Organic Compounds, with the purpose of analysing Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons.

Anything else I left out?

Gugu

Re: VPH calibration failing

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:05 am
by Peter Apps
Hi Gugu

The EPA numbers mean something only to people who use EPA methods. I don't so you haven't told me anything.

Peter

Re: VPH calibration failing

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:17 pm
by Steve Reimer
The standards for petroleum hydrocarbon methods tend to be very stable. For extracted samples/standards in DCM by 8015 (our diesel range) for example, our calibrations are good for a year or so and the standards don't go bad unless mistreated. If you are having reproducibility issues I would start with your headspace unit.

Re: VPH calibration failing

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:16 pm
by Gugu
The standards for petroleum hydrocarbon methods tend to be very stable. For extracted samples/standards in DCM by 8015 (our diesel range) for example, our calibrations are good for a year or so and the standards don't go bad unless mistreated. If you are having reproducibility issues I would start with your headspace unit.
Hi Steve

Thanks. That's what I needed to know.

Kind regards
Gugu