- 
								
 - Posts: 154
 - Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:27 pm
 
I used a couple of Waters Corporation application notes to develop and validate a method for niacinamide, thiamine, pyridoxine, and riboflavin combined in a product. The method uses the Atlantis dC18 column and a gradient with mobile phase A (0.2% v/v TFA) and mobile phase B (10:90 0.2% v/v TFA to acetonitrile). The samples and external standards are diluted in purified water and analyzed at 275 nm.
The gradient is:
Time MP-A MP-B
0 100% 0%
5 100% 0% isocratic hold, separates niacinamide and thiamine
15 89% 11% ramp to elute pyridoxine
28 89% 11% isocratic hold to elute riboflavin
29 0% 100%
33 0% 100% isocratic hold, flush column
34 100% 0%
44 100% 0% isocratic hold, re-equilabrate column
I get great analyte peak and degradant peak separations, peak symmetry, and generally good %RSD. But, I sometimes get very variable pyridoxine results (82 - 108% label claim).
When the pyridoxine results are low, all the separately prepared samples in the run are low. The external standard peak areas and the other analytes in the samples are generally very comparible between the runs that exhibit lower and higher results.
Does the pyridoxine stick to glassware or HPLC components in a variable fashion? Should I be using the expensive HPLC vials? Does it react differently to the ion pairing reagent each time of sample preparation?
Some here have heard that the pyridoxine does not like ion pair reagents. Also the same with these vitamins in general.
Any advice, wisdom, and / or prayers would be greatly appreciated.
