There are many manufacturers who make 50% Phenyl 50% methyl silicone phase capillaries, the equivalent of OV-17.
My company Supelco calls their three equivalent capillary column phases, SP-2250, SPB-50, and SPB-17, the latter two are bonded and may be rinsed. Slight differences may be noted with certain analytes but these are considered G3 type phases by the USP.
Porapak N and Hayesep N are similar porous polymer columns and due to the fact that some means of bonding the beads to the capillary wall surface must be used there may be slight differences in selectivity. In fact there are often slight differences in selectivity of different lots of beads used in packed columns. Usually these are not noteworthy and rarely cause problems of even the most minor nature.
If speed of analysis is the motivation with changing from a packed porous polymer column to a capillary column I must tell you I believe that you will not gain much if anything going to a capillary column in most cases.
Instead use micropacked columns and you will find you still have a large sample capacity which is quite handy when using a TCD detector and you will shorten your analysis time, often by half.
They may be used in a split mode if desired or directly using a much smaller sample size and flow rate, 100µL and 5cc/min for example, but to gain speed a higher flow can be used, 20cc/min. for example.
If you still intend to use capillary PLOT porous polymer columns several manufacturers use a newer formulation for N using divinylbenzene and ethyleneglycol methacrylate polymer in their PLOT capillary columns. This may also be called A or U polymer as well as N. There may be selectivity changes to the historical selectivity of Porapak N. You should check with the vendor to determine if your requirements are met by their columns.
best wishes,
Rodney George
Senior Research and Development Scientist
Gas Separations Research
Supelco
595 North Harrison Road
Bellefonte, PA 16823
814-359-5737 voice
814-359-5459 fax
rodney.george@sial.com