-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:10 pm
Advertisement
UPLC calculator
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
I'm trying to take a 3 mins isocratic run using conventional column and transfer it to UPLC to get a much shorter run time. However, when I use the UPLC calculator, the minimum retention factor I can enter is 5. Is there a way to enter less than 5 for the retention factor? What impact does retention factor has on the final conditions......other than N and run time? According to the UPLC, the retention factor is the analysis time divided by the column dead time minus 1. Can someone explain how you obtain this equation?
-
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:37 pm
How curious, I just gave this same answer to another thread on this forum. We recently published an article in LCGC online that describes how to accelerate a method. The theory is rather tedious, so there is a step-by-step description and tutorial. See: http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/advanst ... tartpage=6
Mark Tracy
Senior Chemist
Dionex Corp.
Senior Chemist
Dionex Corp.
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Hi gtma,
I never used the calculator so I don’t know whether there is a way of entering a smaller number than 5.
But I’m surprised by the fact that 5 is the smallest value one is allowed to enter. I always go for retention factor (K) between 2 and 10, when developing a new method. And I know many people who will agree that K ~ 2 is just fine. But as I said I find it easier to rely on gut feeling/experience. Especially in your case (isocratic elution) I wouldn’t bother to use the calculator.
K influences – besides N – the resolution and even the sensitivity. The latter is due to peak broadening, which results in lower peaks, when K is too high (e.g. > 10)
Her is the equation: K=(tR – t0)/t0 ~ (tR/t0) – 1
Best Regards
I never used the calculator so I don’t know whether there is a way of entering a smaller number than 5.
But I’m surprised by the fact that 5 is the smallest value one is allowed to enter. I always go for retention factor (K) between 2 and 10, when developing a new method. And I know many people who will agree that K ~ 2 is just fine. But as I said I find it easier to rely on gut feeling/experience. Especially in your case (isocratic elution) I wouldn’t bother to use the calculator.
K influences – besides N – the resolution and even the sensitivity. The latter is due to peak broadening, which results in lower peaks, when K is too high (e.g. > 10)
Her is the equation: K=(tR – t0)/t0 ~ (tR/t0) – 1
Best Regards
Learn Innovate and Share
Dancho Dikov
Dancho Dikov
-
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:19 pm
The scaling method is actually very straightforward, if you use a constant ratio of column length to particle size L/dp, for example going from a 15 cm 5 micron column to a 5 cm 1.7 micron column. Now, you simply need to increase the velocity by the ratio of particle sizes, in this case 5:1.7, and change the corresponding flow rate with the column crossection.
F(UPLC)/F(HPLC)= dp(HPLC)/dp(UPLC) * ID(UPLC)^2 / ID(HPLC)^2
dp is particle size, ID is column internal diameter.
The calculator will do this for you, even for a situation where the ratio of column length to particle size is not constant. It will do so by matching the plate count. The reason that I shied away from very short retention factors is that at short retention, extra-column effects play a role, and I can not calculate extra-column effects for an HPLC system that is unknown to me. The initial version of the calculator allowed the user to input extra-column effects, but based on user feedback, we threw this out again.
The calculation of the retention factor is in textbooks.
F(UPLC)/F(HPLC)= dp(HPLC)/dp(UPLC) * ID(UPLC)^2 / ID(HPLC)^2
dp is particle size, ID is column internal diameter.
The calculator will do this for you, even for a situation where the ratio of column length to particle size is not constant. It will do so by matching the plate count. The reason that I shied away from very short retention factors is that at short retention, extra-column effects play a role, and I can not calculate extra-column effects for an HPLC system that is unknown to me. The initial version of the calculator allowed the user to input extra-column effects, but based on user feedback, we threw this out again.
The calculation of the retention factor is in textbooks.
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Mark, please excuse me, your post must have arrived while I wrote mine. I’m sure your link gives more comprehensive answers.
Best Regards
Best Regards
Learn Innovate and Share
Dancho Dikov
Dancho Dikov
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 34 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 33 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 33 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 33 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
