-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:54 pm
Advertisement
When is the chromatography you are looking...
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
not the chromatography you validated? An issue has come up recently where a method was being run in our QC lab and the retention of all of the components had shifted dramatically shorter. The analysts in the QC lab did not see this as a problem. What guidance can I give them to let them know how much variability is acceptable before the mehod is considered different?
George Balock
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:23 am
you make your own acceptance criteria. So depending on the results during the method development ( not method validation) you can specify the time window for the retention.
If peaks elutes beyond that window the analyst should be warned. You could also program your software to do so: it will not recognize and not a report your product.
If you have a robust method , windows could be narrower.
But it depends also on the selectivity you obtain, how well resolved are your peaks.
If all retention times have shifted check your solventcomposition , pump flow
so set your criteria, and check look at your chromatogram before you report
regards
philippe
If peaks elutes beyond that window the analyst should be warned. You could also program your software to do so: it will not recognize and not a report your product.
If you have a robust method , windows could be narrower.
But it depends also on the selectivity you obtain, how well resolved are your peaks.
If all retention times have shifted check your solventcomposition , pump flow
so set your criteria, and check look at your chromatogram before you report
regards
philippe
-
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:59 pm
Personally, I like to consider k (or N), resolution for my critical pair, tailing for the most tailing-prone peak and RSD. Depending on the type of method I'm working on (and how bad the chromatography is), I may just use one of these criteria, or all 4.
Thanks,
DR

DR

-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:57 am
We consider the following factors: K prime, resolution between peaks, tailing factor and RSD. In a lot of case we specify mobile phase composition tolerating 2-5% variation. You can change retention by adjusting mobile phase composition. Tolerance for retention, resolution, tailing, and mobile phase composition should be specified in the method.
Temperature might play a critical role, too. We had once a method which was validated during summer time in one of the "warmer" places with "ambient temperature" and when we transferred method to Europe (Sweden) variation of retention time was around 6-8%.
Another possible reasons: proportional valves, equilibration, mobile phas e preparation,
Temperature might play a critical role, too. We had once a method which was validated during summer time in one of the "warmer" places with "ambient temperature" and when we transferred method to Europe (Sweden) variation of retention time was around 6-8%.
Another possible reasons: proportional valves, equilibration, mobile phas e preparation,
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 14 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 14 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science