First of all, most FDA issues with training relate to documentation and paperwork rather than content.
That said, I know this is going to sound self-serving, but:
Putting together a good training program is a
tremendous amount of effort. I typically plan on about 1 day of effort for each hour of presentation time -- and that's with a 20-year backlog of slides, figures, chromatograms, etc. to draw on. Unless you will be doing this on your own time (i.e., for free), it's far more cost-effective to have your people trained by someone who has done it before and can therefore spread that development effort over a larger base. Someone like, ahem, LC Resources:
http://www.lcresources.com 
If you don't want to go that route, there are excellent computer-based training programs available that would allow your analysts to work through the material at their own pace. Check out Academy-Savant for some good ones:
http://www.academysavant.com/
Another cost-effective alternative is audio or web seminars. John Dolan and I will be doing a series on LC Troubleshooting for GMP Training Systems:
http://www.gmptrainingsystems.com
LC-GC Magazine also sponsors "webinars", as do many of the instrument companies.
As far as FDA being satisfied, I can only speak directly about our own courses:
- the FDA sends their people to our courses,
- we've done literally hundreds of courses for pharmaceutical companies over the years, and have never had anyone complain about them not being good enough for FDA.