-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:12 pm
Advertisement
ISO 17025 Requirements
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am looking into the quality control requirements for HPLC liquid flowmeters, and whether any bodies or organisations are being asked to provide ISO 17025 accreditaed calibration for their flowmeter, i.e via UKAS / NIST / DKD
-
- tom jupille
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:55 pm
In forty years of HPLC, I have never seen a flow meter actually used. Flow accuracy is measured periodically as part of performance qualification, but that is typically done the "old-fashioned" way with a stopwatch and a volumetric flask. For day-to-day operstion, the drad time (t0) on the chromatogram provides verification.
So zI think the answer is "no".
So zI think the answer is "no".
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:37 pm
Hi fumanchu69,
In my time as an Army contract chemist we worked under ISO 17025, and while once we had to demonstrate the successful operation of an ion chromatograph in the presence of vibration (ie. tanks driving past the lab, artillery firing and the like) we never had to demonstrate eluent flow rate delivery by any other means than as Tom described...a volumetric flask and validated timer were sufficient. I suppose, to be "extra thorough", you could validate the volume of the volumetric flask...once you've done that though, you may be "stuck" with doing that every time afterward, please be warned.
In my time as an Army contract chemist we worked under ISO 17025, and while once we had to demonstrate the successful operation of an ion chromatograph in the presence of vibration (ie. tanks driving past the lab, artillery firing and the like) we never had to demonstrate eluent flow rate delivery by any other means than as Tom described...a volumetric flask and validated timer were sufficient. I suppose, to be "extra thorough", you could validate the volume of the volumetric flask...once you've done that though, you may be "stuck" with doing that every time afterward, please be warned.
MattM
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 385 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 383 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 383 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 383 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science