GC, MS or GC/MS for gas analysis at trace levels ?
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:37 am
Hello,
I am working in an academic research group working on molten salts applications for nuclear reactors. We are now conducting 3 experiments needing a gas analyzer.
In each of those experiments, we want to analyze the composition of the gas phase of our containers. The gas phase will be Argon with traces of other compounds, probably at ppm levels like H2 and isotopes, HF, F2, CF4, CH4, and probably carbon oxydes.
We are now looking for information on what technology we should use, particulary between GC, MS, GC/MS. I found it difficult to see clearly a difference between those technology for this type of application.
I am novice in this kind of technology, and looking for advices from people that are more used to GC and MS (you guys!). What would be the pros and cons for this type of application, for those devices?
Thank you very much for your time
I am working in an academic research group working on molten salts applications for nuclear reactors. We are now conducting 3 experiments needing a gas analyzer.
In each of those experiments, we want to analyze the composition of the gas phase of our containers. The gas phase will be Argon with traces of other compounds, probably at ppm levels like H2 and isotopes, HF, F2, CF4, CH4, and probably carbon oxydes.
We are now looking for information on what technology we should use, particulary between GC, MS, GC/MS. I found it difficult to see clearly a difference between those technology for this type of application.
I am novice in this kind of technology, and looking for advices from people that are more used to GC and MS (you guys!). What would be the pros and cons for this type of application, for those devices?
Thank you very much for your time