Advertisement

universal detector

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

8 posts Page 1 of 1
I want to know the advantages/disadvantages, purpose, and differences of the application of a universal detector.

Thanks,
Winnie

There are several "universal" detectors. To which one are you referring?
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374

a short description of LC detectors like RI and ELSD vs UV/Diode Array.

I can probably look at the book you suggested, but I would like to personally ask as well.

Thanks
WW :lol:

If your analyte(s) have a significant chromophore in the UV (molar extinction coefficient > 10^2 or so), UV at an appropriate wavelength will be a better choice (more sensitive; fewer interferences).

If no chromophore, then RI or ELSD will be required. They are, however, more prone to interferences ("universal" means they respond to everything, whether you are interested in it or not).

If you are dealing with proteins, there are almost always enough aromatic residues to make UV detection at 280 nm feasible.

I hate to sound like a broken record, but there is a more detailed comparison of detector options in the Basic HPLC and CE of Biomolecules book ( http://tinyurl.com/n4knp ) I recommended in the thread on insulin ( http://www.sepsci.com/chromforum/viewtopic.php?t=4729 )
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374

That is cool.

I guess I have some good reading tonight.

Thanks again
WW :P

Dear 'woow':

Did you mean 'universal' as "commonly used in most LC separations, and available from many HPLC vendors" or 'universal' as "used for most (or all) species in LC separations, but is available from one vendor"?

In the former case, there are some detectors on the market: UV-Vis, RI, or ELSD.

In the latter case, there is only one: The Corona-charged Aerosol detector, available from ESA Analytical (www.esainc.com). The selling points: more sensitive than RI and UV detectors; can be used for isocratic and gradient (RI does not work for gradient); not limited by the presence of chromophores.
(We currently do not have this detector, but I am planning to put together a proposal to acquire it next year).

Alfred.

what I am looking for if anybody seen, approach, or favor the advantages of using RI, UV, ELSD, MS, etc. in analysis of say proteins and where am I limited by using any of the detection systems.

Thanks,
Winnie
8 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 353 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 351 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 351 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry