Page 1 of 1

GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:44 am
by Gugu
Hi

I am currently trying to get an appropriate or relevant EPA method for analysing THMs with the Bruker Scion SQ GC-MS, from which I can develop a method that suits the 5% column I am using. Does anybody know where I can get a method like that other than the EPA 501.3 method?

Sincerely
Gugu

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:48 am
by dblux_
Hi

I am currently trying to get an appropriate or relevant EPA method for analysing THMs with the Bruker Scion SQ GC-MS, from which I can develop a method that suits the 5% column I am using. Does anybody know where I can get a method like that other than the EPA 501.3 method?

Sincerely
Gugu
All EPA methods are available online. What do you think about 524.3 ?
What's wrong with 501.3 ?
BTW - DB-5 column resolves all THMs perfectly

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 1:35 pm
by Gugu
"All EPA methods are available online. What do you think about 524.3 ?
What's wrong with 501.3 ?
BTW - DB-5 column resolves all THMs perfectly"

Was looking at the 501.3 method with a Bruker product specialist and he says the column specified on the method sets everything off even though our method was modified to suit our needs according to the column I am using, on which I run four other methods by the way. Hence, that may give us problems for accreditation purposes.

I had not checked method 524.3, thanks will do just now.

Gugu

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 7:01 pm
by dblux_
"Was looking at the 501.3 method with a Bruker product specialist and he says the column specified on the method sets everything off even though our method was modified to suit our needs according to the column I am using, on which I run four other methods by the way. Hence, that may give us problems for accreditation purposes. "
The paragraph 5.10.1 of the method 501.3 says: "Other
columns may be used if they provide data with adequate accuracy and
precision as specified in this method."

As you can see you don't need to be affraid of using DB-5 column instead of phased out packed columns form old 501.3 method.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:33 am
by dblux_
What column exactly do you use ?
I anticipated capillary DB-5, but you didn't confirmed.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:49 am
by Gugu
What column exactly do you use ?
I anticipated capillary DB-5, but you didn't confirmed.
Sorry about that, Rxi-5Sil MS, 30m, 0.25mmID and 0.25 um df. max temp is 350 degrees and min is 320 degrees.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:08 am
by dblux_
What column exactly do you use ?
I anticipated capillary DB-5, but you didn't confirmed.
Sorry about that, Rxi-5Sil MS, 30m, 0.25mmID and 0.25 um df. max temp is 350 degrees and min is 320 degrees.
It's DB-5 equivalent. It won't resolve all VOCs, but will resolve all THMs. 30 m is enough but film thickness may be to low.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:14 pm
by Gugu
It's DB-5 equivalent. It won't resolve all VOCs, but will resolve all THMs. 30 m is enough but film thickness may be to low.[/quote]

Oh okay thanks a lot I will look into it.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:38 pm
by Hornet
Rxi-5SilMS is equivalent to DB-5MS, they are both silarylene columns.
DB-5 is equivalent to HP-5 and Rtx-5.

The first two columns are slighty different than standard 5% phenyl and they may exhibit different separation on some compounds.

Probably they won't affect VOCs, they are usually SVOCs specific.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:09 pm
by dblux_
0.25 µm film thickness on 0.25 mm ID column should be O.K. for VOCs.
Good luck and let us know about the progress.

Re: GC-MS THMs EPA method

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:09 pm
by James_Ball
Are you doing the extraction with Pentane? If so you have to look really hard to find Pentane that does not have traces of Chloroform. We did the 501 method for years and that was our most difficult problem.

If you are using purge and trap that isn't so much of a problem, which is why we run 524.2 and moving to 524.3 for the THMs.

For THMs now I run the Rxi-624SilMS column. The max temperature is 320C which makes it compatible with the oven temperatures of the Rxi5SilMS columns so I actually have both in the GC at the same time, and join them together before going into the MS so I can run all the Volatiles and Semivolatiles on one instrument, Purge and Trap connected to the 624 column and the 5 column is in a Split/Splitless injection port.