Wavelength accuracy [August 23, 2004]
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:34 pm
Wavelength accuracy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By MK on Monday, August 23, 2004 - 07:42 am:
Hi,
How can you validate a wavelength accuracy of a detector at low wavelengths (200-240nm)?
If you ignore this, how do you justify the use of low-UV's?
The lowest peak of Holmium solution (nasty stuff..) is at 240nm and only 279 nm for a holmium filter (which I'd prefer for safety reasons).
Have you received a certificate for the holmium filter inside agilent 1100 instrument? What have they (agilent) told you about the expiry date and recalibration of this filter?
thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By joe on Thursday, August 26, 2004 - 04:28 am:
Use a caffiene solution!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By annony on Thursday, August 26, 2004 - 12:16 pm:
How about code red?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By MK on Monday, August 23, 2004 - 07:42 am:
Hi,
How can you validate a wavelength accuracy of a detector at low wavelengths (200-240nm)?
If you ignore this, how do you justify the use of low-UV's?
The lowest peak of Holmium solution (nasty stuff..) is at 240nm and only 279 nm for a holmium filter (which I'd prefer for safety reasons).
Have you received a certificate for the holmium filter inside agilent 1100 instrument? What have they (agilent) told you about the expiry date and recalibration of this filter?
thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By joe on Thursday, August 26, 2004 - 04:28 am:
Use a caffiene solution!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By annony on Thursday, August 26, 2004 - 12:16 pm:
How about code red?