-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:54 am
So I have been consistently running a method with the following method parameters:
Inj vol: 10uL
Flow: 1ml/min
UV: 240nm
Isocratic 78/22 MeOH/H2O
Column: Thermo Hypersil Gold C18 100x4.6mm 3u particle size
Initially I have had no problems at all with sample analysis (analysis of Pyrethrin I and Pyrethrin II, to be specific). Now, over time, I have seen the Pyrethrin I peak start to front and my pressure has continually increased. I was originally running around 250bar. Now the system will go as high as 310bar.
If I run the system with ACN/H2O instead of MeOH, I don't see this type of pressure build up - this isn't too problematic as I know the solvents have different viscosities. I just have trouble understanding why the same mobile phase is causing such a large pressure built up all of a sudden.
I have run 100% acn through the column, I have run 50/50 acn/water, and other variations in attempt to clean the column if methanol wasn't eluting everything from the sample, but that didn't help.
My second questions:
When I run the above method with ACN/H2O instead of MeOH/H2O, I see significant sample recovery differences.
For examples: ACN/H2O - 3.87% (4% nominal)
MeOH/H2O - 3.97% (4% nominal)
Same sample, same standards, but I have significant recovery problems when running ACN/Water.
The thing is, in all the research I've done, most people seem to be running some variation of ACN/Water gradient or isocratic when analyzing pyrethrin on HPLC.
Anyway, I know I have quite a bit here, a second perspective or opinion would be great to hear. I'm the only one that does any analytical chemistry in my lab so I don't really have anyone to bounce ideas or theories off of except myself.
