Advertisement

Does anyone use PerkinElmer HPLC systems?

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

13 posts Page 1 of 1
i need somebodys opinion about it. thx in advance

Hi there,

I have used it in the past. What do u need to know?

Regards

Salma
i need somebodys opinion about it. thx in advance
yes friend,
i had used it. it was dame good but may be due to cosrt factor we had very few system but otherwise it gives rsd. but the sofware was bit tedious and not user friendly
with regard
Donal

When we were looking to get our LC system we were going to get an PE setup however we could find no-one that we trusted to give us a good word about it. Our sister company in the states said that theirs was in bits more often than not, the people we used to do our external analysis said that the one they (mainly use Agilents but aquired one PE) had worked for 6 months in 5 years and that they were glad to see the back of the one they had.

And then there's TotalChrom... :x

I don't want this to sound like an anti-PE rant as I quite like their GC hardware and I'm sure that some people are absolutely delighted with their PE systems but I couldn't find them! In the end we followed the herd and got an Agilent.

I have used one on line with a API-300 mass spectrometer. that was 8 years ago so I guess there are new models available. The one I used, no complains in general, the syringe plugged more than I would like to see, but at the same time the autosampler was used to inject about 100 organic synthesis samples which were not the cleanest in the world...

Dear fellow:

We had one P-E HPLC system, and we retired it about 2-3 years ago, when P-E told us that it would no longer support the pump and the detector (the LC system was used with an integrator). It was in use for about 15+ years, and I used it for about 4 years. It ran as expected, without problems. But the old autosampler was replaced by a newer model before I started.

We don't use the newer models made by P-E that are controlled by PC, because our company wants to buy lower-cost models. We currently have Shimadzu and Dionex systems.

Alfred.

thx All for Your opinion, and...how do U think, how PE HPLC systems compare to Thermo Finnigan's?

and what about that TotalChrom :?: is it so much NOT user friendly :?:
We currently have a number of Perkin Elmer LC's (Series 200 components with a mixture of 785 and Series 200 UV and DAD detectors). The main reason we started using them was because we were using TotalChrom and liked having instrument control.

With respect to performance, the autosampler is probably the weak point. RSD at low injection volumes is typically higher than other vendors although acceptable. The pump and UV detectors are excellent.

As far as TotalChrom, we've used it for many years and have been very happy with it. As with many things, there is good and bad. When comparing, say TotalChrom and Empower, TotalChrom has far better reporting and is also simpler to use. My suggestion would be to try and look ahead to what you'll be using the acquisition system for, several years into the future. What's important to you? Reporting, instrument control, ease of use, expandability.

All my lab is Perkin Elmer, I has worked with them for 7 years, they have very good hardware but the software is not freindly at all!!!
my personal opiniom is that this is a sftware probaly good and perfect for pharmaceuticals, Highly recomended!!!!
But when your bussines is to work with you instrument developing new methods and working with so many diferent sample this total chrom could become a real headache!!!
if you do not have to develop method, specially HPLC it would be very good for you!!

r nelson....can u get in touch with me on sadsal123@yahoo.com please coz I really need some advice about total chrom coz as ncute says, its a pain! I cant get it to quantify properly.

Regards,

Salma

One curious thing Ihve found is that traditional PE users are very happywith their instruments and rarely change supplier... but in other hand I do not know many users buying PE for the first time.

Personally, I must admit PE is far beyond of being one of my favourites... :D

I think Turbochrome is well suited for routine analysis and our girl are, after some years of usage, quite clever on it. Teaching them e.g. Empower would be one of my personal nightmares. of course you have to live with compromises.
And i'am less enthusiastic about the LC Hardware. When we used it on a daily basis, with some effort it would run quite smooth, but in my opinion there are smarter and more reliable systems availible.

Alex
13 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry