-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:22 pm
During the development one column failed, it lost completely the efficiency. It happened one or two days after experimenting the method at 60ºC. At this higher temperature only 2 injections were performed, but the supplier concluded that probably it was the high temperature the cause of the column failing and changed the column.
We went on with the new column and begin the validation. After one week work we noticed that, although the column did not fail completely, it "visually" lost the efficiency when compared to a new column.
At this point we stopped the validation, it is not worthly to validate a method and have a 1-2 weeks column life.
We tried several "equivalent" columns from different suppliers and choosed one of them that gave the more similar selectivity (Luna C18 3µm 150 x 4.6 mm). This column did not even resist one day of work, after overnight it failed completely.
I do not know what is happening. Theoretically the mobile phase is not so aggressive to distroy columns overnight. We have several methods with acetonitrile / water or tetrahidrofurane / water that do not give problems, but we do not have any method with the mixture of the three solvents.
Would the mixture of them be so aggressive?
Did anyone have the same experience?
The other columns that we tried and had acceptable selectivity were:
- Luna Aqua
- Supelcosil ABZ Plus
- Symmetry C18
- Symmetry Shield RP18
- Atlantis dC18
- Platinum EPS C18
- Nucleodur C18
(all type of columns that we are currently using...).
Does anyone have experience with these columns using mixtures of H2O : CH3CN : THF?
I would very much appreciate your opinion/suggestions.
Thanks in advance!
Kati

