-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:00 pm
Advertisement
Gradient
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
11 posts
Page 1 of 1
Hello I am trying to separate some sterols in the product by using C18 column. During my experiment I have to use methanol as MP on the first four components and methanol:water 92:8 for the other components. I have got a low pressure gradient pump. Can anyone let me know how to set up the gradient programme please. I have tried some different programmes but they are not working. Thanks a lot.
-
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:19 pm
92% methanol is a weaker mobile phase than 100% methanol. Your gradient should start with 92% methanol and go to 100% methanol.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:00 pm
Thanks for help, Uwe. If I use weak methanol (92%) as eluent by isocratic method I can sepearte all compounds, But the retention time will be very long. That' s why I want to use 100% methanol first as the first 4 components will be eluented out within 10mins. The other two components (only can be sepearted at methanol:water 92:8) then will be coming out later. (around 50 minutes at weak mobile phase). This is only my thoughs. I am a newbird for using gradient pump. The results I got were not like what I have thought. Can you give me some advice please. Thanks!92% methanol is a weaker mobile phase than 100% methanol. Your gradient should start with 92% methanol and go to 100% methanol.
-
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:19 pm
So you have reasonable retention of all your compounds still in 100% methanol, but the last two do not resolve. In this case, a gradient back to 92% methanol is not going to help, and you need to figure out other ways to find a solution.
How about an isocratic separation with an intermediate solvent composition, say maybe 95% methanol?
How about an isocratic separation with an intermediate solvent composition, say maybe 95% methanol?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:02 pm
May I suggest checking with Klaus Bischoff at Bischoff Chromatography. He introduced a new approach to HPLC at Pittcon with his new POPLC which is as I understand it Phase Optimization LC. This uses a new approach which will allow you to basically build your own column in segments to create the optimal separation. (This is not an advertisement...I saw it at Pittcon and was impressed.)
I hope this helps you.
Jeff
I hope this helps you.
Jeff
-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 3:15 am
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:06 pm
I would try another column Type (if availible check C8 columns) or
blend your methanol with other solvents like acetonitrile or some THF.
Alex
blend your methanol with other solvents like acetonitrile or some THF.
Alex
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:00 pm
Thanks for everyone's help. I have tried 95% methanol but the last two peaks can not resolve until 92% methano was used. I have another option: under isocratic condition the first four peaks can resolve very well in 12 minutes by using 100% methanol as mobile phase. The other components can be well seperated in the acetonitrile :water (97:3) mobile phase around 35mins. Can I use gradient pump to put this together? I have tried a bit. But it was not working to me. I haven't used THF as I have beening thinkging the gradient method will work for me. I am going to try THF if it is not working.(but I have tried acetic acid before). Thanks again.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:56 pm
Have you tried a gradient with starting composition of 92:8 and hold for 2 to 5 min then ramp the methanol conc to 99% over 8-10 min then hold the 99% as long as needed to elute the other components. I try to never run 100% organic in a c18 column. also sounds as though you need a weaker stationary phase, try c8 or phenyl. Whenever I need gradients starting at organic conc around 90% I start to think I have the wrong column.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 7:17 am
KC:
I wonder what discomfort may it cause?
Hi KC,try to never run 100% organic in a c18 column.
I wonder what discomfort may it cause?
Thanks,
Foren
Foren
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 3:23 pm
I do not know the disconfort of KC, but mine might be similar.
If you have to use 100% organic is because you are having excessive retention for your analytes, which means your chromatography has a major probability to become problemaic!
I would move to a less polar column, such as C8 or to a different specificity, such as Phenyl.
If you have to use 100% organic is because you are having excessive retention for your analytes, which means your chromatography has a major probability to become problemaic!
I would move to a less polar column, such as C8 or to a different specificity, such as Phenyl.
11 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 62 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 61 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science