Discussion on Data Validity
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:26 am
Dear all,
here is the incident:
I am using PFPD (Pulsed Flame Photometry Detector) for my works (organophosphorus pesticides analysis) and recently (2 days ago), the detector was down due to some unforeseen circumstantial, there were 3 batches of samples waiting for analysis and I can't wait for 2 more months to get the detector fixed up. Now, I notice that we have a new Agilent FPD attached to our neighboring laboratory and they able to let me transfer their detector to my GC (also the agilent GC) for use. My questions are:
1) If I switched my analysis to other detector, would it give any problems to my data? How about the data validity?
2) As the samples are collected continuously, will it be any effects to my internal quality control parameters (LOD, LOQ etc) if I change to different detector?
3) Any precaution steps that I need to take care off?
4) How should I report the data which was generated by different detector? (Any suggestions?)
Thanks and best regards.
here is the incident:
I am using PFPD (Pulsed Flame Photometry Detector) for my works (organophosphorus pesticides analysis) and recently (2 days ago), the detector was down due to some unforeseen circumstantial, there were 3 batches of samples waiting for analysis and I can't wait for 2 more months to get the detector fixed up. Now, I notice that we have a new Agilent FPD attached to our neighboring laboratory and they able to let me transfer their detector to my GC (also the agilent GC) for use. My questions are:
1) If I switched my analysis to other detector, would it give any problems to my data? How about the data validity?
2) As the samples are collected continuously, will it be any effects to my internal quality control parameters (LOD, LOQ etc) if I change to different detector?
3) Any precaution steps that I need to take care off?
4) How should I report the data which was generated by different detector? (Any suggestions?)
Thanks and best regards.