-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 pm
Advertisement
High Percent RSD for vinyl chloride
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
8 posts
Page 1 of 1
Trying to resolve problem with vinyl chloride failing % RSD. Response factors decreasing with increased concentration. Any ideas?
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 12:20 pm
Hello
You didn't write anything about method:
-parameters for GC
-sampling technique - Purge and trap?
More details you give, quicker answer you'll get
Regards
Tomasz Kubowicz
You didn't write anything about method:
-parameters for GC
-sampling technique - Purge and trap?
More details you give, quicker answer you'll get
Regards
Tomasz Kubowicz
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:28 pm
What is your main problem, RSD or response factors ?Trying to resolve problem with vinyl chloride failing % RSD. Response factors decreasing with increased concentration. Any ideas?
Relevant details neccessary if you want anybody to devote time for your problem.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 pm
The main problem appears to be the decreasing response factors which is causing the %RSD failure. We are getting linear curves for all gases, except for vinyl chloride. The responses for vinyl chloride are linear for the first 3 calibration points and then start declining from the midpoint to the highest level.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 pm
Sorry for lack of details. I will post them next. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 pm
Running Purge & Trap Tekmar ATOMX autosampler, 5mL purge volume, 11 min purge time and Supelco "K" trap VOCARB 3000. Agilent 7890B GC and 5977A MS with Agilent J&W DB-VRX 20m x 0.180mm x 1.0um column. 50:1 split ratio, Calibration range 5 to 200.
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:28 pm
EPA 524 method accepts quadratic regression. Will this help to get acceptable RSD for vinyl chloride ?
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:03 pm
Using the 6mm draw out plate? BFB_Autotune? Dry purge?
You should consider upping the split to 150:1.
You should consider upping the split to 150:1.
8 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 20 users online :: 4 registered, 0 hidden and 16 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
