Area percent on TCD calculation on overloaded column
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:25 pm
I inherited a method which I am obligated to try and use. Viewing the main peak I can see it is not gaussian but has front edge leading peak indication column overload or method condition is not optimal. My question is this... will it make a calculation difference if a peak is front edge leading peak in an area percent method vs. a more symmetrical peak shape?? I always thought that really no matter the shape the amount coming out the TCD was the same, and the integration still would find the same area.