Sample Vial Septum Contamination
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:19 pm
Hello all,
If this is in the wrong place, please feel free to move it mods.
Due to the baseline issues with GC-MS system over the past month (there is a separate thread regarding this), I have had to send some samples to a colleague at another university for GC-MS analysis. I extracted the cuticle surface chemicals from 30 mg of mites using 1 ml of hexane, which I then blew down to 200 ul under a stream of nitrogen. My colleague insisted that I run my extractions on a GC-FID prior to sending them to to him for GC-MS analysis to confirm that I had peaks (mite cuticle extractions are extremely tricky due their size and he didn't want to waste our time). Perhaps rather foolishly I decided to run my samples overnight using an auto sampler and then package the samples up to post the following morning without changing the vial caps after the septa have been pierced. Fast forward to today and he has emailed me to say that my samples are useless as the pierced PTFE/silicone septa have allowed some solvent to evaporate and also contaminated the sample. I had a quick google around and only found one source regarding this ([url]http://www.americanlaboratory.com/914-Application-Notes/35726-How-Pierced-PTFE-Silicone-Septa-Affect-GC-MS-Experiments/[/url. Basically, I want to know how common this is and whether any of you have experienced it before?
Thanks,
Joe
If this is in the wrong place, please feel free to move it mods.
Due to the baseline issues with GC-MS system over the past month (there is a separate thread regarding this), I have had to send some samples to a colleague at another university for GC-MS analysis. I extracted the cuticle surface chemicals from 30 mg of mites using 1 ml of hexane, which I then blew down to 200 ul under a stream of nitrogen. My colleague insisted that I run my extractions on a GC-FID prior to sending them to to him for GC-MS analysis to confirm that I had peaks (mite cuticle extractions are extremely tricky due their size and he didn't want to waste our time). Perhaps rather foolishly I decided to run my samples overnight using an auto sampler and then package the samples up to post the following morning without changing the vial caps after the septa have been pierced. Fast forward to today and he has emailed me to say that my samples are useless as the pierced PTFE/silicone septa have allowed some solvent to evaporate and also contaminated the sample. I had a quick google around and only found one source regarding this ([url]http://www.americanlaboratory.com/914-Application-Notes/35726-How-Pierced-PTFE-Silicone-Septa-Affect-GC-MS-Experiments/[/url. Basically, I want to know how common this is and whether any of you have experienced it before?
Thanks,
Joe