Deactivated silica in transfer line
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:00 am
Hello all,
i'm thinking about putting a piece of deactivated silica in the transfer line (and couple it to my analytical column) instead of the end of the analytical column itself. The system is used to analyze PAH's and transfer line is held at 300°C-320°C to minimize PAH tailing.
The reason i want to do this is because I think that then:
1) the column itself is exposed to lower temperatures overall and should show less degradation (peaks of higher boiling PAHs start to tail after a while and trimming the transfer line piece helps)
2) I could actually use a lower transfer line temperature, since deactivated silica is far less retentive (analytes migrate at 150°C less than they would do from a coated column)
3) Replacing the piece in the transfer line is cheaper and would not impact the chromatography, since the analytical column does not have to be trimmed.
Are my assumptions correct? If so, which consideration should I take when choosing diameter, length etc... for the deactivated tubing.
The analytical column I use is a Select PAH 15m*0.15mm*0.1µm from Agilent. I'm thinking about 0.5m of 0.15mm or 0.12mm i.d. tubing.
Thanks in advance for the input!
Kind regards,
Jasn
i'm thinking about putting a piece of deactivated silica in the transfer line (and couple it to my analytical column) instead of the end of the analytical column itself. The system is used to analyze PAH's and transfer line is held at 300°C-320°C to minimize PAH tailing.
The reason i want to do this is because I think that then:
1) the column itself is exposed to lower temperatures overall and should show less degradation (peaks of higher boiling PAHs start to tail after a while and trimming the transfer line piece helps)
2) I could actually use a lower transfer line temperature, since deactivated silica is far less retentive (analytes migrate at 150°C less than they would do from a coated column)
3) Replacing the piece in the transfer line is cheaper and would not impact the chromatography, since the analytical column does not have to be trimmed.
Are my assumptions correct? If so, which consideration should I take when choosing diameter, length etc... for the deactivated tubing.
The analytical column I use is a Select PAH 15m*0.15mm*0.1µm from Agilent. I'm thinking about 0.5m of 0.15mm or 0.12mm i.d. tubing.
Thanks in advance for the input!
Kind regards,
Jasn