Reverse phase gradient by increasing bufer conc.
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2015 7:37 pm
This is in some ways a general question on reverse phase HPLC gradients of a type I'd seen from time to time. The gradient goes something like this:
Time %A %B %C
0 min 2 20 78
10 min 20 20 60
Where A is a buffer -- 35 mM ammonium acetate, B is acetonitrile, and C is HPLC water. The column is a typical C18, and the first analyte to come off is potassium sorbate, and the second is phenoxyethanol, the second one being a more non-polar molecule of these two typical preservatives.
My question is: how does this work? The solvent concentration is the same. The water concentration is essentially the same. There's greater salt concentration, but how does that drive a reverse phase separation? Diminished water activity because of greater ionic strength? What problem does methods such as these fix? And what sort of pitfalls are there in making methods such as these?
Time %A %B %C
0 min 2 20 78
10 min 20 20 60
Where A is a buffer -- 35 mM ammonium acetate, B is acetonitrile, and C is HPLC water. The column is a typical C18, and the first analyte to come off is potassium sorbate, and the second is phenoxyethanol, the second one being a more non-polar molecule of these two typical preservatives.
My question is: how does this work? The solvent concentration is the same. The water concentration is essentially the same. There's greater salt concentration, but how does that drive a reverse phase separation? Diminished water activity because of greater ionic strength? What problem does methods such as these fix? And what sort of pitfalls are there in making methods such as these?