Advertisement

Amidopropyl dimethylamine and respective quaternized salts a

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

7 posts Page 1 of 1
Does anyone work with amidopropyl dimethylamines and respective quaternized salts analysis? I have, recently, synthesized the compound stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, which I have to do a HPLC/CG analysis. Which conditions and column should I use?

Than you
The GC analysis would be hard, because the Stearamidopropyl dimethylamine have a very high boiling point, so you should have appropriate GC system and high temperature columns.

For HPLC I think i would go with C8 column. The Stearamidopropyl dimethylamine have long aliphatic chain so the interaction with stationary phase will be strong. Preferable use a column with very good endcaping (or other types of silica with very low silanols activities) to avoid peak tailing caused by the nitrogen atoms in the substance.

The C18 column will have more interaction with stationary phase than C8 column so the % of organic solvent should be much higher. Maybe the RP-amide column could give an interesting selectivity, something to try on.
Thank you, Kreall!

Could you give me some reference on endcapping, I am not familiarized with the term. Also, which detector should I use? I have been reading some journals which say that a UV detector wouldn`t work well.
Here are some references about columns:
http://www.lcresources.com/tsbible/16041998.pdf
http://www.sepscience.com/Techniques/LC ... nd-capping
http://www.lcresources.com/tsbible/21032003.pdf

also the whole page about HPLC trubleshouting is someting maybe you should look it to.
http://www.lcresources.com/tsbible/

I can't think why using UV detector is not a good idea for this substance. Maybe someone used a specific mobile phase with was not appropriate for UV detection. It is hard to me to say, I don't have much expierence with analysing surfactants.
The problem with UV detection is that with this compound you must use a low detection wavelength (something in the range 200-220nm) because there's no decent chromophore besides the carbonyl. Still, sensitivity will not be very good. At such a low wavelength you'll see all sorts of stuff included in your sample, so specificity might be a problem.
Doesnt' mean that it cannot work, though.
You are going to have two problems, severe tailing on RP columns and LOD/LOQ for your compounds. Mixed-mode might be a viable solution with UV or ELSD detection.
Something like these:
http://www.sielc.com/Application-Separa ... olumn.html

if you only care about hydrophobic quats, then this is your best approach:
http://www.sielc.com/Compound-Cetylpyridine.html
Vlad Orlovsky
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
Thank you very much!
7 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 20 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 19 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry