-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:28 pm
Advertisement
Not identifying calibrated peaks
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Hello, I'm having a problem with calibrated peaks not being identified even though a peak is being identified at the same retention time the calibrated compound is set up. Any ideas?
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:38 pm
CDS = ?
calibrated peak integrated?
peak entirely within retention time window?
type of detector?
Lots of ideas, no data to go on.
calibrated peak integrated?
peak entirely within retention time window?
type of detector?
Lots of ideas, no data to go on.
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:13 am
Hello
It looks like you have to specify range for peak identification - it is normally expressed as ∓ % of retention time for calibrated peak.
For example in Agilent Chemstation it is in "calibration options"
Regards
Tomasz Kubowicz
It looks like you have to specify range for peak identification - it is normally expressed as ∓ % of retention time for calibrated peak.
For example in Agilent Chemstation it is in "calibration options"
Regards
Tomasz Kubowicz
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:28 pm
We are using Chem Station version B.03.02. and an FID detector.
To better illustrate- the compound is calibrated at a RT of 2.94 +/- 1% (or 0.01 min). A peak will show at exactly 2.94 but will not be identified as my calibrated compound, instead, it will have two times listed at 2.94- one with a line through it and the name of the compound, the other with a question mark and the peak.
To better illustrate- the compound is calibrated at a RT of 2.94 +/- 1% (or 0.01 min). A peak will show at exactly 2.94 but will not be identified as my calibrated compound, instead, it will have two times listed at 2.94- one with a line through it and the name of the compound, the other with a question mark and the peak.
-
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:29 pm
My guess is that if you expand the time scale several times you will find that the peak is slightly flat on top and that the integrator finds two apices separated by less than 0.01 min. You need to play with slope and peak width settings to stop the integrator seeing noise at the apex as a peak end and beginning.
Peter
Peter
Peter Apps
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:28 pm
Thank you for the suggestion; I will make adjustments and see if my readings improve.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 8 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Peter Apps, Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Peter Apps, Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
