by 
lmh » Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:49 pm
													
 
						
					 
					
						Yes, you might be right. I have no idea what instrument you are using, but from the instruments I've used, this seems a bit of a low drying gas flow and low temperature to get rid of 0.5mL/min aqueous solvent. Organic solvents are, of course, easier to dry off.
If you are using something like a single quadrupole instrument, then any droplet that is inadequately dried can enter the mass spec. Not so many droplets will make it all the way to the detector, but some might. The time they arrive at the detector is almost random. The quads are scanning, so depending on the time of arrival, the instrument will look at where the quads have reached in their scan, and assign a mass to the randomly-arriving blob. The symptom is typically a noisy spectrum with the apparent mass of the noise peaks varying from spectrum to spectrum. Typically there will be a big peak in one spectrum, and nothing (or a completely different mass) in the next. This is easiest to see by stepping through individual spectra in an unsmoothed chromatogram. Averaged spectra will contain several random peaks and often look more "real" than they are.
I'd suggest checking the help-files of your instrument to find out if the manufacturers have a recommended set of spray-chamber parameters for your chosen flow. If your drying gas and temperature are much lower than the instrument's maximum values, try increasing them. If necessary, consider putting a tee before the mass spec, and diverting some of the flow to waste, so the instrument doesn't have to handle the whole 0.5mL. Many instruments work very well with 200-300uL/min, and the tee does not reduce sensitivity because ESI gives a signal proportional to concentration, not to amount of material.